High Ranking Police Folk Allegedly Behaving Badly

[dapaterson]

A police officer can keep their job after drawing their service weapon on another officer and threatening them with it.

Much more job security than your average joe and the worst take advantage of that.

3 a.m. teasing instigates officer to pull gun on co-worker: RCMP code of conduct hearing | Globalnews.ca

A code of conduct hearing said a Kelowna constable, after being incessantly teased, pulled a gun on a co-worker in March 2019.

globalnews.ca

Meanwhile if I were to do such a thing for starters even threatening someone where I work is grounds for immediate termination (the running joke is if you are going to threaten someone you might as well hit them as your fired either way). And that is excluding the host of charges that would be thrown at me likely resulting at the minimum of losing my firearms license, and jail time.

Meanwhile police officer does it a year of supervision on the job with 15 days pay docked. Definitely a double standard at work.

The ultimate (so far) Canadian police story:

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/hamilton/donovan-perjury-acquittal-1.7272601

 

[Jarnhamar]

A police officer can keep their job after drawing their service weapon on another officer and threatening them with it.

Pointing a firearm, assault with a weapon, using a firearm in the commission of an offense, careless use of a firearm, uttering threats.

What did the other RCMP officers get in the way of discipline for just watching this unfold?

 

[Eaglelord17]

Pointing a firearm, assault with a weapon, using a firearm in the commission of an offense, careless use of a firearm, uttering threats.

What did the other RCMP officers get in the way of discipline for just watching this unfold?

It doesn’t sound like any thing. Here is another article on it with more information (stating the chief wanted her fired). Somewhat difficult to research, search engines don’t want to go back that far and many news article links are dead now.

Kelowna cop transferred for pointing gun at officer who was teasing her - Kelowna News

A former Kelowna RCMP officer was transferred and docked pay after pointing her gun at a fellow officer who was teasing her, while they were inside the Kelowna detachment.

www.castanet.net

Just googling her name shows she was with the RCMP in 2022 in Cowichan area. Good chance she is still employed.

Double standards like this is unacceptable in my opinion. The police need to be held to a higher standard than your general public specifically due to the level of trust and power placed in their hands. Punishments should be more severe not less.

Not to mention is this who you want to show as the minimum standard for your workplace? To have your new recruits come in and be told ‘yeah it’s a slap on the wrist for one of the most serious offences you can make’?

It seems she is doing fine, however she should not have been given the second chance. Getting fired should have been the least of her worries. Firearms prohibition and jail time should have been required.

 

[Jarnhamar]

Double standards like this is unacceptable

You don't think you can point a loaded pistol at a RCMP officer, threaten them, and walk off with a $3000 to $4000 fine and transfered job locations (paid move presumably).

 

[brihard]

Pointing a firearm, assault with a weapon, using a firearm in the commission of an offense, careless use of a firearm, uttering threats.

What did the other RCMP officers get in the way of discipline for just watching this unfold?

Given that it went to a conduct hearing, sounds like they reported it. From the limited description in the written conduct decision, we don’t know who did what after the brief span of seconds the incident took place in. We don’t have a video de they the others “just watched this unfold”, though we do have evidence all but one of them didn’t see much. A place the size of Kelowna would have a couple levels of supervisor on shift; the appropriate actions would be to report it up right away and truthfully provide statements on what they saw to assist an investigation. If that was done there would be no reason to do a conduct investigation on any of the witnesses.

Worth noting that RCMP only publishes their most serious conduct matters, those that go to a “conduct hearing”. Those are conduct processes where the member’s job is on the line. They also have “conduct meetings” for lower stuff, pretty comparable to a CAF summary hearing. An RCMP conduct hearing can’t do criminal so it would kind of fall between a summary hearing and a court martial. They can’t impose detention or prison but can impose large fines.

Anything criminal for RCMP or other cops would go through normal civilian court, separate from the conduct process.

 

[Haggis]

The ultimate (so far) Canadian police story:

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/hamilton/donovan-perjury-acquittal-1.7272601

Un-freakin-believable! But, that's not necessarily a Canadian police story but more of a Canadian law story.

 

[dapaterson]

Un-freakin-believable! But, that's not necessarily a Canadian police story but more of a Canadian law story.

"On duty police officer attacks other on duty police officer, second officer shoots first officer ten times" would seem, at first blush, to be a police-centric.

 

[brihard]

"On duty police officer attacks other on duty police officer, second officer shoots first officer ten times" would seem, at first blush, to be a police-centric.

It’s at least a little bit policey.

 

[dapaterson]

It’s at least a little bit policey.

To be fair, the article does not mention double-doubles and TimBits, so those core elements of Canadian policing can only be surmised.

 

[Jarnhamar]

Given that it went to a conduct hearing, sounds like they reported it. From the limited description in the written conduct decision, we don’t know who did what after the brief span of seconds the incident took place in. We don’t have a video de they the others “just watched this unfold”, though we do have evidence all but one of them didn’t see much. A place the size of Kelowna would have a couple levels of supervisor on shift; the appropriate actions would be to report it up right away and truthfully provide statements on what they saw to assist an investigation. If that was done there would be no reason to do a conduct investigation on any of the witnesses.

Worth noting that RCMP only publishes their most serious conduct matters, those that go to a “conduct hearing”. Those are conduct processes where the member’s job is on the line. They also have “conduct meetings” for lower stuff, pretty comparable to a CAF summary hearing. An RCMP conduct hearing can’t do criminal so it would kind of fall between a summary hearing and a court martial. They can’t impose detention or prison but can impose large fines.

Anything criminal for RCMP or other cops would go through normal civilian court, separate from the conduct process.

That's why this is a double standard.

If a civilian pointed a loaded pistol at an RCMP officer, even for a second or 'as a joke', they wouldn’t get a conduct hearing. They’d be arrested on the spot, charged, and likely held for a bail hearing. Or just as likely, get a 9mm hollow to the chest. Nobody would be talking about limited descriptions or giving them the benefit of the doubt about who saw what. If the situation involved a civilian pointing a gun, no one would accept 'they didn’t see much' as a reason for zero accountability.

It seems the officers present were having a great old time laughing at the female officer, egging the one office on, then when she pulled out her blaster in the office all of a sudden those officers were inspecting their feet, checking their phones, and reading the minutes from last months safety meeting. Exaggerating but we both know why people all of a sudden don't see anything.

It looks like this incident didn’t immediately trigger criminal proceedings. Instead it appears it stayed almost entirely inside the RCMP’s internal disciplinary system. There's no viable excuse why this incident should have been treated as an internal matter when pointing a firearm at someone is a criminal act for everyone else in Canada. The handling of this incident looks like the organization insulating its own members unfortunately.

 

[dapaterson]

Imagine if a CAF member illegally brought their personal weapon into a secure zone at work. Certainly that would warrant significant punishment - especially if they were, say, a MWO in the military police, NCIU, aircraft security officer. Right?

Anderson J.A.J. (Master Warrant Officer), R. v. - Chief Military Judge

Get quick, easy access to all Government of Canada services and information.

decisia.jmc-cmj.forces.gc.ca

 

[Haggis]

It’s at least a little bit policey.

Up to the point where it ends up in court. Then, it's just another attempted murder case.

@dapaterson no Timbits or double-doubles are allowed in courtrooms.

 

[brihard]

That's why this is a double standard.

If a civilian pointed a loaded pistol at an RCMP officer, even for a second or 'as a joke', they wouldn’t get a conduct hearing. They’d be arrested on the spot, charged, and likely held for a bail hearing. Or just as likely, get a 9mm hollow to the chest. Nobody would be talking about limited descriptions or giving them the benefit of the doubt about who saw what. If the situation involved a civilian pointing a gun, no one would accept 'they didn’t see much' as a reason for zero accountability.

And by the time anyone on scene realized what was going on her gun was back in the holster. And that’s where our knowledge of the facts ends. The decision doesn’t tell us who then did what. It doesn’t describe much of the conduct investigation. We don’t know if charges were referred to crown and declined (remember this is BC, and this was all going on when courts were badly messed up during COVID.)

It seems the officers present were having a great old time laughing at the female officer, egging the one office on, then when she pulled out her blaster in the office all of a sudden those officers were inspecting their feet, checking their phones, and reading the minutes from last months safety meeting. Exaggerating but we both know why people all of a sudden don't see anything.

As you say, exaggerated. I’m going to stick to what limited established facts we do have. Thinking of any office I’ve worked in, I could easily buy a situation where most can’t see everything going on, especially if she in fact stayed sitting.

It looks like this incident didn’t immediately trigger criminal proceedings. Instead it appears it stayed almost entirely inside the RCMP’s internal disciplinary system. There's no viable excuse why this incident should have been treated as an internal matter when pointing a firearm at someone is a criminal act for everyone else in Canada. The handling of this incident looks like the organization insulating its own members unfortunately.

As I said we don’t know that. We would only know if charges were approved by B.C. crown. They would only happen after an investigation. That investigation would not be carried out by the officer’s immediate colleagues who were present at the times; that would be handled by a professional standards unit.

I can say with confidence they a whole lot of various criminal stuff in society at large went unaddressed during COVID, and note that the event in question happened on March 6th, 2019. I remember things getting super weird about a week later.

Your original comment I’m challenging is that the other officers on scene should have been hit with conduct proceedings. You don’t have an evidentiary basis to say that.

 

[brihard]

Imagine if a CAF member illegally brought their personal weapon into a secure zone at work. Certainly that would warrant significant punishment - especially if they were, say, a MWO in the military police, NCIU, aircraft security officer. Right?

Anderson J.A.J. (Master Warrant Officer), R. v. - Chief Military Judge

Get quick, easy access to all Government of Canada services and information.

decisia.jmc-cmj.forces.gc.ca

Absolute discharge? Sweet deal.