• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

Iraq!

  • Thread starter Thread starter babicma
  • Start date Start date
B

babicma

Guest
Take a look at these flash presents..

Should have speakers..

1. http://www.bushflash.com/occupied.html

2. http://www.bushflash.com/liberation.html

3. http://www.bushflash.com/antivic.html

4. http://www.ericblumrich.com/PD.html

5. http://www.bushflash.com/vets.html

6. http://www.bushflash.com/pl_lo.html

7. http://www.bushflash.com/antiwar2.html

Number 8 is about 911 INTERESTING!

8. http://www.bushflash.com/buddy.html

9. http://www.bushflash.com/memorial.html

10. http://www.bushflash.com/topgun.html
 
I could‘nt play the clips but I went to the webpage and this guy is the biggest idiot I‘ve read in a long time. However unlike some of my left-leaning compadres on this site I still believe he has the right to spout this garbage and not be censured by some judge in B.C.[heard THAT before?] This reminds me of a joke I heard yesterday, Whats the difference between a puppy and a liberal? The puppy stops whining when he grows up. :dontpanic: CHEERS
 
Good slide shows that send a VERY powerful message, but keep a open mind remember these people want to get rid of Bush.


A WARNING IS IN ORDER FOR #6 AND #7.
 
Depleted Uranium Factsheet from the WHO:

http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs257/en/

http://www.who.int/ionizing_radiation/env/du/en/

Just something to counterweight the extremist propoganda.
 
I‘ve seen some of these before, heard some of the arguments. There is an agenda, but I basically feel that it balances out quite a bit in regards to the propaganda which is served to the west on a daily basis. I don‘t go in for political rhetoric.

#10 is the one I enjoy. IMHO, I doubt that Bush was a good soldier and the guy did create quite an interesting record for himself during his time in the NG. There is a quote by someone I‘ve forgotten, but I concur with the sentiment. Those who decide to go to war should have experienced a war prior. Something along those lines. It‘s difficult to comprehend the ease that a man such as Bush can send others into harms way when he himself did his utmost to avoid combat. His test scores just make me laugh, remove his patronage and he‘d be finding himself in a completely different situation, but that‘s the system, and it could be worse. He wasn‘t the only chosen son to avoid the war, and many other conscientious objectors chose to flee the country which isn‘t necessarily better.

I prefer to believe that it‘s best to lead by example. That may not always be the most suitable choice, but it‘s a tenant I strive to follow. It doesn‘t work well for everyone. This should be a consideration in the evaluation of Bush and co.

History will be the judge of this period of time. There are arguments for and against the current activities of the Bush administration and its effects on the world. One thing is clear, there have been effects. Whether Libya decided to step in line due to the actions in Iraq and Afghanistan is a possible argument in favour. The occupation of Iraq will be contested for years to come, but whether it was about power in the middle east, oil, vengeance for Sept 11, or bringing Burger King to the region, is going to become an academic question.

As for the conspiracy theories, "did Bush have a hand in Sept. 11, etc..." place those on the pile with the others. Many books and movies will continue to provide entertainment for us in the years to come.

What matters is now, and as we are seeing at this time, there is a problem with western intelligence. It would be nice if communication channels were to open amongst many nations, without the emphasis on the paranoia and fear that has corrupted the administrational systems, and actually having the truth be told for a change, without censor or agenda. The population can handle that, they do not need to be handled.
 
How exactly do these people think the US should deal with the guerillas? They shouldn‘t conduct raids and drag them away for interrogation? They should let em kill American troops who are trying to rebuild Iraq? Seems kinda backwards to me.
 
Originally posted by Enzo:
#10 is the one I enjoy. IMHO, I doubt that Bush was a good soldier and the guy did create quite an interesting record for himself during his time in the NG.
George W. Bush was the first reservist in history ever to go NES? It says he found work, and then went to Harvard Business School. How many lieutenants go NES from the Canadian reserves every year, when they find better jobs or school opportunities?

And if Canada was fighting an undeclared and unpopular war, and losing, would you be so quick to volunteer for overseas employment? I respect those that did, but given the eventual outcome of the Vietnam War - and you now have guys like McNamara back in the spotlight admitting they knew at the time it was all wrong - isn‘t it a bit hard to get really pissy about those who found other options? What good would George W. Bush have been had he got shot down over North Vietnam in 1970? Can you imagine Al Gore at the helm on 9/11?

Originally posted by Enzo:
[qb]There is a quote by someone I‘ve forgotten, but I concur with the sentiment. Those who decide to go to war should have experienced a war prior. Something along those lines. [/qb]
What, you mean like Gefreiter Adolf Hitler of the 16th Bavarian Infantry Regiment? Who served on the Western Front almost continuously throughout the Great War, was wounded twice, and decorated twice for bravery, and by all accounts was a very good soldier (though not cut out for non-commissioned officer status)?

What about George S. Patton, Jr., who fought in Mexico before WW I, then in the Great War, and finally as a division, corps and army commander in WW II, who advocated starting a war against the Soviet Union in mid 1945?

Douglas MacArthur commanded the 42nd Rainbow Division in the Great War, then was a theatre commander in the Pacific in WW II, and led a UN army in Korea. He advocated an invasion of China and use of nuclear weapons north of the Yalu River.

What about the US Secretary of Defence, Robert S. McNamara, who helped plan firebombing raids on Japan in 1945? He was one of the brains behind the War in Vietnam.

Lyndon Johnson saw military service in the Second World War, and so did his predecessor, John F. Kennedy, who ordered the Bay of Pigs invasion, and blockaded Cuba even at risk of starting a nuclear war.

Even if you could enforce "mandatory combat service" as a prerequisite to a leader declaring war, what do you honestly think it would change?

All of the men above served bravely, some like Adolf Hitler, Patton and MacArthur were highly decorated. John F. Kennedy was remembered for his personal courage also. Didn‘t seem to stop any of them from participating in brinksmanship, or feel any need not to use military might to achieve their goals.

Many of them killed people face to face, or at the very least experienced misery and saw friends die close up. Patton shot two banditos in Mexico and put them on the hood of his car like game trophies!

Here‘s another one - Harry S Truman served in the trenches of World War One - and in 1950 sent soldiers to fight and die in Korea.
 
Mike - I said I agreed with the sentiment. Experience should be a factor, something for the individual to be able to draw upon. I‘m not endorsing (nor did I ever say anything about) Mandatory Combat Service. I will always support a volunteer army. As for the people you chose to use as a basis for your comparison, interesting first choice :D

As for Bush volunteering for overseas duty or the popularity of the Vietnam War, etc... Come on, give me a break. I mean the man cannot account for his whereabouts for an entire year?? No military record has been provided to corroborate his time at the base in Alabama. This is in addition to other information that is simply offensive. Scoring 25% and still being allowed to be trained as a pilot? That just offends the pilot in me as I worked hard to become one.

http://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/tribune-review/national/s_177797.html

http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A7372-2004Feb2?language=printer

With as spotty a record as he had while he was serving, its no wonder that his party wishes that the issue would go away. If daddy wasn‘t running interference for him, then he‘d be in a completely different position today. That‘s the way it goes though. I‘ve never been a fan of nepotism.

The thing is, I can separate these things. I have many opinions about the state of affairs these days, who doesn‘t. That‘s the fun of debating. Solely on the topic of Bush‘s past military record however, more information is forthcoming. The man is the President, he lives under a microscope. Let‘s see the documents Dubya. This is a question of credibility and honour, which is still something that should matter in this, the attention deficit age.

Just a though eh.
 
Absolutely fantastic. Incredibly strong message about the less popular side of any war. No war can be fought without ugly brutal things happening. Otherwise we‘d be having them every second weekend. Never long enough to miss the NHL playoffs or the Superbowl though. They‘d finish just in time for the people to forget by the coming election. Why someone would probably even have one to get their dirty little hands on liquid assets (oil) to help balance out a 7 trillion, that‘s US$7 000 000 000, deficit. Oh wait, uh I mean, uh...

Oh I see... you clever little man.
 
I watched all of those clips...

What a pack of b*ll**** artists!

The thing that really gets me going is that the average every day person doesn‘t know the difference and would probably feel like an insider buying into this garbage.

Enough said!

Slim
 
And as for what good would it have done Bush for possibly getting shot down over North Vietnam? Well, absolutly no good as far as I can see. But that never stopped hundreds of thousands of other American boys from going over, drafted or not. These same American boys were enjoying the same great privilege of American citizenship as Dubya did but they felt duty bound to return the honour by serving their country. They may have possibly even knew it was a losing cause.

I agree with the part that experience in war does not a great leader make.
 
Originally posted by Padraig OCinnead:
[qb] And as for what good would it have done Bush for possibly getting shot down over North Vietnam? Well, absolutly no good as far as I can see. But that never stopped hundreds of thousands of other American boys from going over, drafted or not. These same American boys were enjoying the same great privilege of American citizenship as Dubya did but they felt duty bound to return the honour by serving their country. They may have possibly even knew it was a losing cause.

I agree with the part that experience in war does not a great leader make. [/qb]
I have nothign but respect for Vietnam veterans and do place them in a higher category than the likes of Bill Clinton, George W. Bush, Rush Limbaugh, and all the talking heads today who talk about service. But if they had all refused to go...just up and said no...sometimes I think the human species are far too sheeplike for their own good.
 
Well, thats a big load of garbage babicma. Are you going to form an arguement with that stuff, or are you just going to force us to try and watch all of it without puking.
 
Babicima what a steaming pile of bullshit. The author of those clips is a misinformed hippy-crunchy moron with no insight.
 
I agree that the folks who made these clips have an agenda, who doesn‘t? Having said that, I do have a problem with Republicans going ga-ga over Bush landing on an aircraft carrier knowing full well that the man pulled strings with his dad (a Congressman from Texas at the time) to jump the queue and get into the Texas Air NG. For a good article on this see: www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/campaigns/wh2000/stories/bush072899.htm

Bush worries me with things like the Patriot Act (I and II)...I really don‘t think he has much respect for the U.S. Constitution.

As far as the brutality of war goes, I am lucky enough to not have experienced it first hand. However, having heard of some of the things that Saddam & Sons did to their own people, I really think the Iraqis are better off with the Americans in charge.

Bottom line is that I support what the U.S. did in Iraq, but I think it was poorly planned as far as an exit strategy goes. Bush? I don‘t like him, never have, never will. The Republican Party deserves better!


Richie
 
It is nice to see someone who doesn‘t like Bush manage to give a decent enough answer. Welcome to the site.
 
I‘m not trying to start an arguement. I just recieved this e-mail and I thought it was interesting and I remember like a week ago there was a discussion about Iraq.

I ABSOLUTELY oppose the Iraq operation and I thank God that Canadians are not there.

But, I thought that this e-mail would be interesting for people to see.

Sorry, My Bad!
 
Originally posted by babicma:
[qb]
I ABSOLUTELY oppose the Iraq operation and I thank God that Canadians are not there.
[/qb]
Why did you oppose an operation with goals of bringing freedom to a people oppressed for over 2 decades under a brutal regime like the one Saddam led? Thousands of people died under Saddam‘s regime, beaten to death, for foolish reasons like the fact that the Iraqi soccer team didn‘t win, or even more foolish, their homes being raided at night and them being taken away from their families, never to be seen again.

Sorry, but if you weren‘t behind the US mission to topple Saddam, you must have supported Saddam Hussien‘s brutal rule. Saddam refused to comply with the UN resolutions and the US decided to enforce the resolutions the rest of the world (aside from the Brits and the Poles) were unwilling to. Sure, people were killed and people were wounded, both civilians and soldiers, but I much rather a few thousand people dying now rather than allowing Hussien to stay in power for another decade and killing another million people, gassing and beating them to death.

Not wanting to bring peace and freedom to the Iraqi people just shows the selfishness many people in the Western world have.
 
Back
Top