Antifa shows up at protest over and over again, causing damage and physically harming people.Last I saw, the Convoyists weren’t declared a terrorist organization. Did some idiots say they should be? Probably, but no one serious listened to them.
again nobody is saying that it is not an issue, just that you haven't established that they qualify as a terrorist organization.Maybe they should have worn black, covered their faces with mask and painted antifa on their trucks that way, you guys could pretend it was not an issue.
To be honest, I don't know know all the criteria to be listed as terrorist organization. As Brihard pointed out, there is no "criminal organization" list.again nobody is saying that it is not an issue, just that you haven't established that they qualify as a terrorist organization.
Start with a google search. Then get come back to the conversation. Antifa is a real movement, I can assure you.
Maybe we could edit the books they’re allowed to read, and given them hours of specific political instruction reinforced with physical activity. Ideally in a secure location.To be honest, I don't know know all the criteria to be listed as terrorist organization. As Brihard pointed out, there is no "criminal organization" list.
My concern, is stopping young university kids (for the most part) getting wrapped up in this movement. I am all for opinions and free speech, but when these clowns consistently strike and beat people, no way, it needs to stop.
Lots of people are anti fashion. Our DEUs for one highlights that…Movement does not equal group. A movement is in fact a wildly different thing. Here’s a google answer to explain it to you, per your badly written request:
“A group is a collection of individuals focused on shared, often narrow interests, while a movement is a broader, more decentralized collective effort driven by personal beliefs and a vision for widespread social or political change”
Wrt “Antifa” Wiki agrees it is a Movement - not a group- ie it is decentralized and based on personal beliefs. This article (What – or Who – is Antifa?) summarizes it well “anti fashion is a view point not an organization.”
So I guess my question is what other viewpoints or thoughts would you like to outlaw and how do you plan to enforce that? Because while I agree that violent crime needs to be prosecuted, holding a view counter to Canada First isn’t a crime. Especially when to organizers used the phrase “star mass deportation, emigration is necessary” in their own advertising of the event.
Ooof the awkward typoLots of people are anti fashion. Our DEUs for one highlights that…
Antifa shows up at protest over and over again, causing damage and physically harming people.
Meets the criteria for terrorist? Maybe not. Keep in mind, Samiduoin got listed last year and prior to that they were a not-for-profit organization.
Anti-immigration or anti-piss poor immigration POLICY? There is a big difference. This is one case.Perhaps a look at possibly why it got the reaction it did. Don't have to be a card carrying "Antifa" to be vehemently against this kind stuff.
A sample of the advertisements for the rally, from Joe Anidjar's own Instagram account.
Remigration
The location chosen: Christie Pits
In a legal sense, the question has to be asked and answered the opposite way: how do we know antifa 'is' organized? If you are going to make an organization - and I'm not convinced it is 'an' organization - and membership in it a criminal offence, the State best have evidence that can survive the courts and the Charter.Now, I have a serious question, how do we know antifa is not organized?
They could . . . if you had evidence of an agreement to commit an offence. Merely 'showing up' wouldn't cut it. Whatever communications these people make is often on the dark side of the web. Even if it can be established that you and I agreed to meet and Yonge and Dundas at noon, it would have to be established that we agreed to do that as part of a criminal purpose.Could conspiracy charges be leveled under Canadian law to those who participate in organized demonstrations? The mass of some demonstrations provide cover for a lot of more serious issues and as such effectively enable those who torch government buildings and LE vehicles (and toss Molotov’s at LEO’s).
To me extremists who violate laws on any side of a conflict need to be taken to task.