- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 210
Website?
heh...CrapVest...I saw one of my buddies pull the zipper right off his (without even trying) the first night he had it.Grunt said:my issued crapvest has already started to fall apart
heh...CrapVest...I saw one of my buddies pull the zipper right off his (without even trying) the first night he had it.
Yep, he did (even I couldn't believe it.) I even saw people that had the fastex buckles on their field dressing pouches rip themselves out (after a few weeks) because the pockets were stuffed with kit (ouch.) Yep, it's not just lack of modularity and carrying capacity that make CTS's creation suck...Kirkpatrick said:the whole zipper? Shocked
Yeah, anything but that, don't give them a reason to blame us for the vest's fragility (even though it's supposed to be mil-spec) and thus design something better (or, with our luck, something worse.)BillP said:LOL don't get to rough on your TV's or else DND will figure out a way to blame you for the TV's failings, LOL Dont Panic
George Wallace said:Always Remember:
Your Kit is made by the Cheapest Bidder!
Double stitching costs more. Stronger buckles and snaps cost more. ETC.
So very true but some times they lose sight of the fact if they had just made it properly in the first place they wouldn't have to replace so many shoddy ones. CTS might have made their budget, but all the replacement vests and parts gotta cost someone somewhere else down the line.George Wallace said:Double stitching costs more. Stronger buckles and snaps cost more. ETC.
George Wallace said:Your Kit is made by the Cheapest Bidder!
BillP said:they definitely cheaped out on the buckles, single stitching only and zipper
...and this is why so many "Tac Vest Sux" threads and horrible stories of the Vest's failure are abundant. With all the other shortcomings (could fill a page,) the Tac Vest needs a revision (at least improved manufacture.)BillP said:it was assembled somewhat poorly, by a Co that had zero experience, prior to receiving the DND contract, in producing mil spec gear!
It not just the cheap buckles; it's mainly how they are attached to the fabric, because of...George Wallace said:Stronger buckles and snaps cost more
NATO Boy said:people that had the fastex buckles on their field dressing pouches rip themselves out (after a few weeks)
You pretty much hit the procurment nail on the head! :-\ As long as it's going to cost 'someone else' down the line, then really all that needs to be done is to get the kit into the sytem posthaste, thus making them look good in the eyes of their superiors! Too much pork-barreling from Gov't, giving the nudge to career minded desk jocks at DNDHQ, to see to it that a firm, in a gov't friendly constituency, gets the nod! By the time the kit is in the system, those that were responsible for it are either out of politics, transferred to another dept, or have gone to the private sector! Either way, not their problem anymore, it has now become that of the user/soldier in the field!MJP said:So very true but some times they lose sight of the fact if they had just made it properly in the first place they wouldn't have to replace so many shoddy ones. CTS might have made their budget, but all the replacement vests and parts gotta cost someone somewhere else down the line.