- Reaction score
- 3,340
- Points
- 1,190
Win the election, for starters.What would you like him to do, by way of deliverables, from the opposition benches ?
Win the election, for starters.What would you like him to do, by way of deliverables, from the opposition benches ?
Win the election, for starters.
Retrospectively:What would you like him to do, by way of deliverables, from the opposition benches ?
Retrospectively:
A- position the CPC as the better option than the NDP to work with, work across the aisle to beneficially impact policy and the governance of the country
B- effectively politic to bring down the LPC when they were weak rather force them to remove the source of their weakness and go on to lose
It looks like he's at least paying lipservice to A this time around, but his approach to 2022-24 failed at both.
I see it more of the LPC going back to where it traditionally has been, the center, and depending on issue bouncing left and right of that line.I am left wondering what the LPC actually stands for and what its principals are. It seems to me to be a party of populism and based more on winning elections at all costs than actually governing.
But hey is the LPC does well that probably means Canada is doing well, so I hope the succeed and I start seeing prices go down and more money in my pocket.
You voted for Poilievre and want him to be prime minister?Win the election, for starters.
I see it more of the LPC going back to where it traditionally has been, the center, and depending on issue bouncing left and right of that line.
not all of it. Far right is an exaggeration but certainly right wing populism was their schtick.So the CPC and its policies, that the LPC is taking, are a centrist party ? And not the far right like some would lead us to believe ?
Being able to pivot and read room seems to be a quality they have. The CPC effed that up spectacularly.Its a strange world we live in. Ol'47 scared a bunch a boomers into voting for an international banker, with a questionable track record, who was now leading the LPC. Then after a decade of out maneuvering the NDP on the left, the LPC now under that leadership has gone hard to starboard and is using the platform of the CPC.
Again, as I mentioned in another thread, what you think populism is in not actually the definition.I am left wondering what the LPC actually stands for and what its principals are. It seems to me to be a party of populism and based more on winning elections at all costs than actually governing.
I’m quite happy with the direction so far. Time will tell.But hey if the LPC does well that probably means Canada is doing well, so I hope the succeed and I start seeing prices go down and more money in my pocket.
not all of it. Far right is an exaggeration but certainly right wing populism was their schtick.
It’s a question of believing who could actually deliver.
Being able to pivot and read room seems to be a quality they have. The CPC effed that up spectacularly.
Again, as I mentioned in another thread, what you think populism is in not actually the definition.
I’m quite happy with the direction so far. Time will tell.
Or the policies of the Trudeau government were so far to the batshit crazy left that Carney's stance on some issues just seems Conservative in comparison...I dunno man. This government is not at all looking like the last government. I read some of his announcements and wonder if a secret cabal of conservatives didn't pull a fast one and get a closet conservative elected as leader of the LPC.
Go read up on what populism is. It is very anti establishment.I'm confused. The CPC is right wing populist, but the LPC isn't. But the LPC is using CPC policies, but they aren't populist.
given the host of announcements and rumors of much of the old guard like bill blair getting diplomatic postings, it seems like the remaining old guard are being shown the door.Or the policies of the Trudeau government were so far to the batshit crazy left that Carney's stance on some issues just seems Conservative in comparison...
Let's hope this government ends up being a totally different beast altogether. And given their minority status, they should be
You don't want to see prices go down. Stable, with a slight movement upwards is good.Its a strange world we live in. Ol'47 scared a bunch a boomers into voting for an international banker, with a questionable track record, who was now leading the LPC. Then after a decade of out maneuvering the NDP on the left, the LPC now under that leadership has gone hard to starboard and is using the platform of the CPC.
I am left wondering what the LPC actually stands for and what its principals are. It seems to me to be a party of populism and based more on winning elections at all costs than actually governing.
But hey if the LPC does well that probably means Canada is doing well, so I hope the succeed and I start seeing prices go down and more money in my pocket.
People who wanted change still didn't want PP in charge.If Canadians don’t want change, they won’t vote for it, regardless who’s in charge of the party.
It's like how Jimmy Kimmel can make jokes about calling ICE on people and get away with it. It's just different.I'm confused. The CPC is right wing populist, but the LPC isn't. But the LPC is using CPC policies, but they aren't populist.
So for option A, try to out NDP the NDP like the LPC did? Not very conservative... They would bleed their entire base to the LPC or some other new party if they tried that.Retrospectively:
A- position the CPC as the better option than the NDP to work with, work across the aisle to beneficially impact policy and the governance of the country
B- effectively politic to bring down the LPC when they were weak rather force them to remove the source of their weakness and go on to lose
It looks like he's at least paying lipservice to A this time around, but his approach to 2022-24 failed at both.