• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

Liberal Minority Government 2025 - ???

I still maintain that Carney and the LPC aren't going to risk it on a spring election.


Abacus for Jan 22-27, 2026

Vote Intention
Liberal: 43%
Conservative: 39%

Leader Impressions
Carney: +23
Poilievre: -6

Government Approval
Approve: 54%
Disapprove: 31%


Interestingly one of the few demographics that Poilievre has a positive impression (30 to 44), Carney is practically keeping pace (9% vs 10%). AB, MB and SK are doing a ton of heavy lifting for him. Liberals also appear to have largely recovered for the 18-29 range.
 
Last edited:
I'm firmly team Gripen.

Team ITAR did you say?

Imagine…”DSCA has announced that Congress has not approved Canada’s request to procure a fleet of ITAR-controlled Saab JA-39 fighter jets.”

And this means the only deal he’s interested in with us, the only one he sees as a ‘win’, is where he walks away with more and we walk away with less, rather than one where we trade more freely, innovate more freely, and we each make the most of our respective advantages.

Dmitri Peskov is pleased with such a collaborative description. 😉

Interestingly one of the few demographics that Poilievre has a positive impression (30 to 44), Carney is practically keeping pace (9% vs 10%). AB, MB and SK are doing a ton of heavy lifting for him. Liberals also appear to have largely recovered for the 18-29 range.

Still time to give them something to think about at the next CPC policy conference when limited abortion legislation via private member bills makes the list of policies to discuss.
 
Only one data point, but survey says: trade over human rights OK as priority dealing with China (for first time since tracking).
Whatever could have caused that start of a shift late last year? 🤷‍♂️
1769703335761.png
 
On Team Blue, Nanos has an interesting short- and long-term tracking of the party's fortunes over different leaders since Harper available (released before the leadership ratification vote). Full report attached, but here's some highlights ....
1769860647914.png1769860519014.png
1769860602362.png
... as well as the loooooooong term party popularity tracking since Harper & Co.:
1769860734025.png
 

Attachments

Team ITAR did you say?

Imagine…”DSCA has announced that Congress has not approved Canada’s request to procure a fleet of ITAR-controlled Saab JA-39 fighter jets.”
Moves like this is how you get point rated criteria to knock off points if the equipment includes ITAR listed components. The intent makes sense, the execution is terrible and way over reaching (ie down to common fasteners, o-rings etc).

It also means that non-Amercian companies will deliberately stop selecting American products for their weapon systems because they don't want to be hamstrung by a foreign government, so limits the export market for defence firms..
 
Team ITAR did you say?

Imagine…”DSCA has announced that Congress has not approved Canada’s request to procure a fleet of ITAR-controlled Saab JA-39 fighter jets.”
One defence to this I've seen a few times is the idea we can just make those parts ourselves.
 
Back
Top