Polls continue to shift towards the LPC. Very clearly showing Carney is resonating with urban voters.
Except that he hasn't done anything yet...
He's announced all kinds of things. But what has he actually
done so far??
...
I guess I qualify as an urban voter (despite technically living in a hamlet) but there's some things I would like clarity on before I could confidently cast a vote for Carney...
- What are the
actual immigration numbers currently? Or moreso, what's the general status of our current immigration goals?
Call me paranoid from the Trudeau years of listening to him say one thing while watching him do another, it's hard for me not to assume that same habit exists with the guy who was his chief advisor for much of the time he was PM.
Are we
actually slowing immigration down?
Or are we still on track to hit the 100 million mark as stated in the "Canada21 Agenda" that magically hit the air waves out of nowhere a few months back?
- What is Carney's actual relationship with Donald Trump like? How far back do they actually go? What is the financial history between the two?
Because on the one hand, it seems like his strategy is to piss off Donald Trump as much as possible...
Whether it's allowing Chinese EV's into the Canadian market (something he was specifically warned not to do, but did anyway...)
Or delaying the purchase of the F-35 for as long as possible (while quietly pushing ahead with another batch, or so I heard earlier today)
To his speech at Davos where he did the
exact same thing that Chrystia Freeland used to do, that destroyed the kind of favour & special relationship that many Canadians and Americans expected to matter more now in the current day, with geopolitical shifts happening the way they are...
...
But that just seems at odds with the kind of relationship you would think the two would have, given the $1B relationship between Brookfield and Jared Kushner.
And the fact that Carney was a big wig at Goldman Sachs during the same years Trump was building his empire from the same city...
They went to the same Christmas parties, sat in the same boardrooms, partied on the same island with the same people, and had extensive financial relationships with each other.
So, just some clarity on where these two
actually stand would be nice...
- What is his strategy when it comes to our natural resources?
So far, American firms have rushed in and bought up all kinds of stakes and shares in Canadian mining companies and projects.
The Pentagon is even openly and actively a major player in a mine in Ontario now.
What part of the "Elbows Up" strategy is this anyway? Is there a brochure or something that I missed on the way in?
And with all this American money buying up stakes & claims in mining projects all over the country, will there still be enough left over to satisfy all those Chinese companies we just agreed to allow access to our markets?
- What is the actual strategy, re China?
Is embracing China - while simultaneously snubbing Trump & pissing him off by allowing China to encroach their influence right up to the US border a good idea?
Because apparently we are expressing an openness in sharing law enforcement intelligence with China along the same lines as we share intelligence with American law enforcement agencies...
This obviously creates a real & tangible security concern for the US, and other members of 5 Eyes as well. Again, is this a good idea?
Not to mention all the other questions we still have about what Carney is negotiating on our behalf... (since he doesn't seem to feel compelled to tell us anything, despite negotiating on our behalf)
I think Carney is running out of time to execute on ANYTHING he said he would do.
Because while approx $2.25B buys the government
a lot of favour with the press corps that we now apparently fund, Canadians from coast to coast to coast MUST realize by now that nothing is changing.
Food inflation is highest in the G7 as a direct result of the government imposing carbon taxes on farmers & food producers, pipelines still aren't being built, he's still choosing to run even bigger deficits than Freeland did, he hasn't lifted the tanker ban, etc etc
As an urban voter...so far this new guy seems
A LOT like the old guy, just more likeable...
Why would I vote for more of the same?