• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

Liberal (Minority/Majority) Government 2025 - ???

Jumping back to politics, C-22 keeps getting pushed forward by the liberals, while I see some major concerns with the bill, especially with the minister being able to compel companies to hand information over. Most of the other provisions still require a warrant to get the information. I can't help but find it ironic that it is very similar to the conservative Bill C-30 from 2012 that ultimately died which would of allowed warrentless access to online data by police. The conversation hasnt died, just changed hands of who is for it and against it.
 
Canada's birthdrate has been dropping for 15 years.

Our population has grown 23% or 8 million people in the last 15 years.

Making it easier to afford living and raising a family in Canada seems like a better plan than relying on a porous border to balance boogeyman birth rate concerns.
Birth rates are not a boogeyman concern.

Having enough working age population paying taxes to fund services to support an ever increasing older cohort is a reasonable concern to have.
 
Birth rates are not a boogeyman concern.

Having enough working age population paying taxes to fund services to support an ever increasing older cohort is a reasonable concern to have.


Affordability is suppressing family formation and birth rates. Addressing housing costs, childcare costs, and wages is a more sustainable long-term solution than relying primarily on high immigration levels.

A country that can't afford to raise its own birth rate will eventually struggle to absorb ever growing population.

The birthrate is being used as a boogeyman to justify terrible immigration practices. Cost of living goes up, it's harder to raise a family, birthrate drops, we need more immigration to pay the bills.
 
Affordability is suppressing family formation and birth rates. Addressing housing costs, childcare costs, and wages is a more sustainable long-term solution than relying primarily on high immigration levels.
I agree.
A country that can't afford to raise its own birth rate will eventually struggle to absorb ever growing population.
Eventually, but much more slowly. Children give governments about 17-30 years of lead time.
The birthrate is being used as a boogeyman to justify terrible immigration practices. Cost of living goes up, it's harder to raise a family, birthrate drops, we need more immigration to pay the bills.
One can be concerned about birth rates without advocating for increased immigration. In fact, i wouod rather see more pro natalist policies being considered more than i want more immigration.

Not everything is a gotcha.
 
What the heck is going on with Poilievre?
Carney got three dropping, so what does that say about him?

She is 70 years old and been in office 11 years, think she is just hanging up her spurs. In Saskatchewan, fairly sure it will be a CPC win.
 
Eventually, but much more slowly. Children give governments about 17-30 years of lead time.

What if a declining birthrate is mother Gaia's way of balancing nature but we're forcing an unnatural population increase feeding into an unhealthy supply and demand loop where the more people we absorb the more they cost Canada and the more the cost of living goes up? Homes, medical services, food, and so on.


One can be concerned about birth rates without advocating for increased immigration. In fact, i wouod rather see more pro natalist policies being considered more than i want more immigration.

You're sounding pro-NDP like me and TheBreadGuy
 
And here is Brian Liley of the Toronto Sun on the minister of immigration.

Liley has gotten a thing or 50 correct in the past

 
Back
Top