If he was simply acting in the best interests of the LPC, he would have called a snap election before the U.S. midterms to secure a decisive majority mandate and reset the clock for four years.Fixed.

If he was simply acting in the best interests of the LPC, he would have called a snap election before the U.S. midterms to secure a decisive majority mandate and reset the clock for four years.Fixed.
Again, its timing, my man. Carney has like a secret crystal ball that tells him when to do something or say something, at just the right the time.If he was simply acting in the best interests of the LPC, he would have called a snap election before the U.S. midterms to secure a decisive majority mandate and reset the clock for four years.
It is almost like he acting in the best interests of thecountryLiberal Party he leads,
.Fixed.
It is almost like he acting in the best interests of thecountryLiberal Progressive Conservative (LPC) Party he leads,
Because it would be bad for the country. Is it impossible for you, who served in the military and the defence of our country, to imagine that anyone would act in the interests of the institution and the country and not just out of self interest? Anyone at all?Again, its timing, my man. Carney has like a secret crystal ball that tells him when to do something or say something, at just the right the time.
His crystal ball is saying even though he is ahead in the polls, don't call an election.
I base what I see on what Carney has done to date, and EVERYTHING he does at the time he does it, has a political goal first and foremost. Take the blinders off and for once consider that politicians will do political things for politcal gains. If Poilievre was doing it, you would be screaming it from the roof tops.Because it would be bad for the country. Is it impossible for you, who served in the military and the defence of our country, to imagine that anyone would act in the interests of the institution and the country and not just out of self interest? Anyone at all?
You seem to believe that you know what is in my head and heart. Please don't do that. So far, you are inevitably wrong when you try to do that.I base what I see on what Carney has done to date, and EVERYTHING he does at the time he does it, has a political goal first and foremost. Take the blinders off and for once consider that politicians will do political things for politcal gains. If Poilievre was doing it, you would be screaming it from the roof tops.
If Carney REALLy wanted to do put the nation FIRST, at speeds "not seen before"Because it would be bad for the country. Is it impossible for you, who served in the military and the defence of our country, to imagine that anyone would act in the interests of the institution and the country and not just out of self interest? Anyone at all?
If Pierre did shit more for political gain than what is right, I would not be pleased with him.f Polievre was making the same moves,
He really is much more a Red Tory than he is a Blue Grit, but he is absolutely the closest to my previously membership supported PC party (I can't argue.
Carney is the best conservative to ever lead the LPC.
Thanks for your personal opinion. It contained no surprises.If Carney REALLy wanted to do put the nation FIRST, at speeds "not seen before"
-He first would have convened parliament in the summer of 2025, as Parliament had most of late 2024 and early 2025 off, they didn't need the whole summer off and contrary to what some think, bills and laws get done in parliament
-He would have repealed the stupid Trudeau era anti-energy laws immediately
-He would have clamped down on Doug Ford for his stupid ad against Trump
-He would clamp down on Eby (anyone think he is not a fool at this point?) on the pipeline development
-He wouldn't hold up the F35 deal while the P8 Poseidon and MQ9 deal is still a go
-He would make getting a deal with the USA a priority MUCH sooner (EU never going to replace the 408 Billion dollars we deal with the USA) and Claudia Sheinbaum seems to be doing ok
-He would have been up front about the Gordie Howe bridge (Even the CBC called him out for it)
Do I keep going? If you Think Carney doesn't do things for political gain, I can't help you.
And your OPINIONS are also noted. Have a great day.Thanks for your personal opinion. It contained no surprises.
I do not need your help, or your vitriol.
Have a great day
I would 'hope' that something that drastic would force the US Congress and Senate to act sharply and swiftly to remove Trump from power.
Welcome back Defense scheme #1
![]()
‘Analyzing risk scenarios’ normal, defence minister says amid Carney’s U.S. invasion comments
Prime Minister Mark Carney has carefully examined the possibility of U.S. President Donald Trump ordering a military invasion of Canada, according to a new report.www.ctvnews.ca
Thats always been the more legit concern imo. Something closer to the Fenian Raids than an actual invasion. Not that we could do much in an actual invasion beyond terrorism.I’m more concerned about “little green men” showing up in Alberta after an unsuccessful seppie referendum.
As Afghanistan and Iran have so eloquently demonstrated sometimes terrorism is all you need. It just takes a little longer. Viet Nam was another exampleThats always been the more legit concern imo. Something closer to the Fenian Raids than an actual invasion. Not that we could do much in an actual invasion beyond terrorism.
How? I thought the Conservative, or at least non-Liberal, mantra was the provinces and feds need to stay in their own lanes.-He would have clamped down on Doug Ford for his stupid ad against Trump
-He would clamp down on Eby (anyone think he is not a fool at this point?) on the pipeline development
How do we know he doesn't? None of us know the actual details of the final stages of trade negotiations and what was said by the two parties. Seeing as we're not the aggressor, I'll take it at face value that the conditions demanded by the US were bridges too far.-He would make getting a deal with the USA a priority MUCH sooner (EU never going to replace the 408 Billion dollars we deal with the USA) and Claudia Sheinbaum seems to be doing ok
How exactly? Ford works for the Ontario voters, not the PM.-He would have clamped down on Doug Ford for his stupid ad against Trump
You mean like when he told BC to get on board, or the money and development would go elsewhere?-He would clamp down on Eby (anyone think he is not a fool at this point?) on the pipeline development
Got specifics on how Mexico is doing better? Is it simply a case of them not having as strong of a hand, so needing to accept whatever America demands? Alternatively, is it a case of we don't hear much about the Mexican dealings with America because reporting is in Spanish and from a different country?-He would make getting a deal with the USA a priority MUCH sooner (EU never going to replace the 408 Billion dollars we deal with the USA) and Claudia Sheinbaum seems to be doing ok