Navy to replace official Heart of Oak march with ‘more inclusive’ music

[PPCLI Guy]

Meanwhile, doing exactly what the CAF expects them to be doing with their 'meagre resources': posturing driven career enhancement



View attachment 89256

This required no resources (and the locations for observances were centrally directed). It was about taking a moment to acknowledge an event that was established in the US in 1999:

What is Transgender Day of Remembrance?

Transgender Day of Remembrance is marked every Nov. 20 and began in 1999 to honor Rita Hester, a trans woman who was killed in Massachusetts.

One person's "posturing driven career enhancement" is another person's statement that all soldiers matter.

 

[brihard]

You mean this one?

I came here to say this.

 

[FSTO]

I saw something online authored by the now retired Commander addressing the briefing note and their reasoning behind their efforts to replace or change the March. If I can find it, I'll post it.

There was some historical yoga in their response to the BN and that was also reflected in the recent press release.
Ie: The conquest was bad for indigenous people? How about Columbus running into the Windward Islands; that was bad.

The Brits could have done to New France what they did to Acadia but they didn’t.

New France was doomed anyway you look at it. The British to the south of them was growing at pace that New France could not match.

The Proclamation of 1763, (to the Yanks known as the Intolerable Acts) gave an occupied group of people a degree of compassion annd retention of rights unheard of in the 18th Century.

And finally, without British help, does anyone think the puritanical Protestant 13 colonists would have given Quebec an ounce of thought if they occupied them? A colder Louisiana anyone?

Keep the tune, get rid of the lyrics.

 

[Stoker]

This was posted online by the author as an open letter and explains their reasoning. Makes sense. Someone did a ATI and posted the briefing notes on REDDIT which at the time caused a stir.

 

[JLB50]

Posts like this make me think about the people who complain that the military is a “social experiment”.

To paraphrase a comment about the US military being “a social experiment” (and I really wish I saved it), of course it has parts of being a social experiment. The US military was racially integrated before broad US society was integrated. The US military also brings together subcultures that would normally not be in close contact with each other. Those are very deliberate social experiments.


And that may be a COA. But remembering the short-lived backlash when a couple of words changed in our national anthem, I’m sure there will be some people mad about that change too.

Edit to add: This got me to a humourous (ok to me) rabbit hole. Heart of Oak wasn’t originally a military march - it was from a pantomime.


So yes, it’s “historic” in that it’s old, but it was essentially a pop song of the time. I wonder if in 200 years, whatever the incarnation of the Royal Marines Band will play The Lonely Island’s “I’m on a Boat” as a historic parade march

The American patriotic song My Country ‘Tis of Thee is, of course, a steal from God Save The King (Queen), which is basically a steal from one of Hayden’s compositions. And then there’s Yankee Doodle which was originally a British song poking fun at the American upstarts. Oh, yes, if I recall my American history correctly, the Star Spangled Banner melody was originally itself a British beer drinking song. The American don’t seem to mind taking a good, existing melody and making it theirs for myth-making purposes…and they seem to have done pretty well by doing so.

 

[Furniture]

This was posted online by the author as an open letter and explains their reasoning. Makes sense. Someone did a ATI and posted the briefing notes on REDDIT which at the time caused a stir.
View attachment 89277View attachment 89278View attachment 89279View attachment 89280View attachment 89281

BLUF: A few words in the lyrics, that are not ever used in an official capacity, are out of touch with modern sensibilities and current day objectives, therefore we should make a new song because "today".

This sort of argument is very much about removing traditions, by cherry picking the worst parts of them and ignore the good parts.

Changing the song won't remove toxic leaders, or in any appreciable way make the RCN a better place to work, but it will remove one more link to the past.

Edit: I suspect there would be far less resistance to this change if the RCN was engaging a composer with a proven record of creating inspiring and "epic" sounding music like John Williams, or Hans Zimmer. Instead, we will get a composer that has made nothing of note, and we will end up with dull and uninspiring music by committee to replace a beloved and well know song.

 

[Edward Campbell]

Couldn't Canada's (abundant) official language community do something with an old established Navy song like this one?

 

[Jarnhamar]

That's a well written reason for the BN, I especially appreciated the Ted Lasso reference.

Speaking about making the navy a better place I'd like to know how this probe turned out.

Minister orders probe after ex-officer accused of sexual misconduct gets job at naval base

 

[medicineman]

Couldn't Canada's (abundant) official language community do something with an old established Navy song like this one?

Quick march of the Royal Marines and USN...I seem to recall that the official/unofficial slow march of the RCN is the slow march of the RM...which is the march of the Russian Preobrajensky Guards...

I did note that the RAN divested itself of Heart of Oak in favour of "The Royal Australian Navy March"

.

I've heard some folks suggesting an instrumental version of "Barrett's Privateers"...can think of worse I suppose .

 

[Edward Campbell]

I have no objection to getting rid of 'Heart of Oak' and/or the :"British Grenadiers;' the aim of both, after all, was, and remains, to some extent, to p!ss off the French who, very arguably, remain, as a French diplomat said when referring to another nation (but one with considerable, proven, military prowess) "a shitty little country." But I think it's easier to recycle than to create anew.

 

[The Bread Guy]

That's a well written reason for the BN, I especially appreciated the Ted Lasso reference.

Speaking about making the navy a better place I'd like to know how this probe turned out.

Minister orders probe after ex-officer accused of sexual misconduct gets job at naval base

Latest public sources (assuming we believe the CBC these days) is he was punted ....
"Defence department dismisses former navy commander from civilian role after review"
... with a more recent account saying this (highlights mine):

 

[dimsum]

I did note that the RAN divested itself of Heart of Oak in favour of "The Royal Australian Navy March"

.

I've heard some folks suggesting an instrumental version of "Barrett's Privateers"...can think of worse I suppose .

The Aussies nearly chose “Waltzing Matilda” as their national anthem in the 1970s, but lost out to “Advance Australia Fair”.

Although to be fair, the theme and lyrics wouldn’t have been very appropriate even then.

 

[PPCLI Guy]

This sort of argument is very much about removing traditions, by cherry picking the worst parts of them and ignore the good parts.

Changing the song won't remove toxic leaders, or in any appreciable way make the RCN a better place to work, (from your perspective as a presumably male PO1 with over two decades of service) but it will remove one more link to the past (of exclusion, misogyny, and a peculiar command climate)

It won't make it better for you. But how about the ~11% of the RCN who are female? Or prospective recruits in an RCN that is critically short of personnel?

From the RCN Association:

There are 760 women currently serving in the ranks of the RCN, representing 11.3% of the navy's regular force, a number lower than the average of women serving in the CAF in general.

I wonder why that is?