When we start them out in an environment which defaults to yelling any time there is a "screw up" (and let's face it, quite a lot of the time said screw up is merely a failure to meet a purposefully set unattainable goal), that sets the standard from the get go for what is considered good leadership, leading to a whole lot of toxicity down the line.By "treating everyone shitty" I meant the rigors of basic training and battle school for example. You know, when someone yells at you for any reason whatsoever in the training environment? That weeded out a lot of people that needed to be weeded out.
The "bad leadership" equation is another topic altogether and I agree there is that too, just like any other organization the world over.
Imagine what our allies think of us as a fighting force…THAT is the crux of the issue. All Canadian kids see is that our gear is broken, our military is short people, our government leaders seem not to care and there seems to be no indications that those 3 things are changing anytime soon. Why would any kid think about joining this clown show.
Substitute "yelling" for creating stressful and challenging environment that includes the application of raised voices and loud noises. Applying hardship is necessary when attempting to turn civilians into soldiers who will hopefully withstand the rigors of war. Unlimited liability doesn't come cheaply. You can mentor later after you've sorted the wheat from the chaff.When we start them out in an environment which defaults to yelling any time there is a "screw up" (and let's face it, quite a lot of the time said screw up is merely a failure to meet a purposefully set unattainable goal), that sets the standard from the get go for what is considered good leadership, leading to a whole lot of toxicity down the line.
Yelling doesn't make people better at their jobs. Weeding people out because you didn't really bother trying to make them better, and just bellowed instead also means we're wasting a lot of opportunity.
The CAF as a whole needs to get better at mentorship, especially at the very beginning.
When we start them out in an environment which defaults to yelling any time there is a "screw up" (and let's face it, quite a lot of the time said screw up is merely a failure to meet a purposefully set unattainable goal), that sets the standard from the get go for what is considered good leadership, leading to a whole lot of toxicity down the line.
Yelling doesn't make people better at their jobs. Weeding people out because you didn't really bother trying to make them better, and just bellowed instead also means we're wasting a lot of opportunity.
The CAF as a whole needs to get better at mentorship, especially at the very beginning.
Quick question. Have you ever instructed on a basic training or junior leadership course?When we start them out in an environment which defaults to yelling any time there is a "screw up" (and let's face it, quite a lot of the time said screw up is merely a failure to meet a purposefully set unattainable goal), that sets the standard from the get go for what is considered good leadership, leading to a whole lot of toxicity down the line.
Yelling doesn't make people better at their jobs. Weeding people out because you didn't really bother trying to make them better, and just bellowed instead also means we're wasting a lot of opportunity.
The CAF as a whole needs to get better at mentorship, especially at the very beginning.
Although, unfortunately, the way things are going, raising your voice for any reason will soon be considered harassment. RSO's on ranges will soon need to get special permission from their Brigade commander to talk loud enough for troops to hear them on the range.Substitute "yelling" for creating stressful and challenging environment that includes the application of raised voices and loud noises. Applying hardship is necessary when attempting to turn civilians into soldiers who will hopefully withstand the rigors of war. Unlimited liability doesn't come cheaply. You can mentor later after you've sorted the wheat from the chaff.
Bingo.....wiener wiener, Oktoberfest dinner... but that part was introduced years ago.
Given our current recruitment and retention issues, I think it is quite clear that we need to put in effort to expand our recruiting pool beyond those who are just already "attracted to military life". This change can be a part of that initiative.
More to the point, I think it is overall more helpful to stop acting like a career in the military needs to become an all encompassing part of your lifestyle (including affects on appearance when off duty). Treat it more like a career and make it worth people's while instead of expecting to get a bunch of people who'll want to make it their entire life busting down our doors.
Huh, come again and what does this even mean? So, CAF should just continue to keep it all 'WHITE' then like they've always done, IOT appease white males? I guess this is while most police forces are full of white males. Got itExactly. This will attract a very small minority and alienate your base recruitment group - white males, who will find these new changes ridiculous. God speed CAF, it can’t get any worse, right?
Is there any change on the beard policy?
Yes, the wearing of sideburns, beards, moustaches and goatees, or combination of style, is authorized for all members of the CAF from recruitment to release. There is no maximum or minimum length. Only, they must be kept neatly groomed and symmetrical in style while always complying with safety requirements and operational requirements.
Can CAF members be asked to shave their facial hair?
Yes, Commanders of Commands, Task Force Commanders, Formation Commanders and Commanding Officers retain the right to order restrictions on the wearing of facial hair to meet safety and operational requirements. This instruction does not supersede Federal or National safety codes or regulations.
That is not an honest inference. The CAF and police forces are "full of white males" because of two general facts: demographics and occupations that interest males.Huh, come again and what does this even mean? So, CAF should just continue to keep it all 'WHITE' then like they've always done, IOT appease white males? I guess this is while most police forces are full of white males. Got it
Anecdotal story on my part. In another lifetime OPS recruiters took a recruiter course we were running. Their applicant pool had dried up and had no waiting lists and the quality of applicants had dropped significantly. They needed to change things up.That is not an honest inference. The CAF and police forces are "full of white males" because of two general facts: demographics and occupations that interest males.
I supported the Officer Training School at CFB Chilliwack, there was minimal yelling in the field and on task, but there was a lot of pressure on them to perform. Tack on very full days for the candidates, that is what cracked many of them, time pressure and not yelling.When we start them out in an environment which defaults to yelling any time there is a "screw up" (and let's face it, quite a lot of the time said screw up is merely a failure to meet a purposefully set unattainable goal), that sets the standard from the get go for what is considered good leadership, leading to a whole lot of toxicity down the line.
Yelling doesn't make people better at their jobs. Weeding people out because you didn't really bother trying to make them better, and just bellowed instead also means we're wasting a lot of opportunity.
The CAF as a whole needs to get better at mentorship, especially at the very beginning.
You really need to get out more and interact with police forces in Canada and not just watch movies about them. I think you find them a very diverse group.Huh, come again and what does this even mean? So, CAF should just continue to keep it all 'WHITE' then like they've always done, IOT appease white males? I guess this is while most police forces are full of white males. Got it
Not the fact that police forces is full of nepotism and they subtle discriminate during hiring???? OK, denial isn't just a river in Africa. Keep head buried in sand.That is not an honest inference. The CAF and police forces are "full of white males" because of two general facts: demographics and occupations that interest males.
I don't know why people think yelling is the most effective way to put pressure on folks; usually you can do it a lot more effectively by being calm but having deadlines, concurrent requirements, large amounts of info being thrown at you etc. My days at basic are almost 18 years ago, and that's what they did then, so I think a lot of the BS comes from movies vice reality.I supported the Officer Training School at CFB Chilliwack, there was minimal yelling in the field and on task, but there was a lot of pressure on them to perform. Tack on very full days for the candidates, that is what cracked many of them, time pressure and not yelling.
There is a saying....empty barrels make the loudest noise.I don't know why people think yelling is the most effective way to put pressure on folks; usually you can do it a lot more effectively by being calm but having deadlines, concurrent requirements, large amounts of info being thrown at you etc. My days at basic are almost 18 years ago, and that's what they did then, so I think a lot of the BS comes from movies vice reality.
After a while, it loses it's effectiveness anyway. If you respect the person you work for/with, really no worse feeling than dropping the ball and disappointing them, and that's way more motivating than volume.
Did you get turned down in a process?Not the fact that police forces is full of nepotism and they subtle discriminate during hiring???? OK, denial isn't just a river in Africa. Keep head buried in sand.
That's called stress inoculation. You're conditioning people to be able to think, respond, and act when they're scared, intimidated, and confused.When we start them out in an environment which defaults to yelling any time there is a "screw up" (and let's face it, quite a lot of the time said screw up is merely a failure to meet a purposefully set unattainable goal),
Ironically, the saying is empty barrels make the most noise.There is a saying....empty barrels make the loudest noise.