- Reaction score
- 1,762
- Points
- 1,140
The Hornet also "tracks" things. Do you call these Trackers as well?
3rd Horseman said:So much for "Deeds not Words"
Larson is a no buddy, Roulue was weak in the Regiment at best other then hockey and being an CMR keener, did he not quiet the CF at one point?
3rd Horseman
Simian Turner said:3rd Horseman,
I was on Arty trg with the two brothers named Rouleau and you are confusing them. One was a weak Arty Offr who graduated from CMR, played hockey and went on to become a Colonel Public Affairs Officer (Marc). Younger brother, Mike, on the other hand did not go to Military College. He joined as a teenager and was impressive from day one. He did leave the military at one point after being injured and joined the Ottawa Police Force. Mike rejoined and resumed his SOF career. He is battle proven and street smart beyond his years. If you knew them like I do you would not confuse them for a second - one would bore you to death and the other would spit chew in your face as his steely-eyed stare brought you to your knees.
Once a Gunner Officer, but never served in 3rd.
3rd Horseman said:I will depart the thread and let the good discussion continue.
3rd Horseman
Well, if all there is in the news is stuff on politicians being, well, politicians, then I guess that no news is good news. Thanks for the update.MCG said:The only hits in the news feed from today are more editorials on the political wordsmith game. The media seem to be settling to the conclusion that the Conservatives have won; the other parties should stop digging for a scandal in the past and start influencing/looking to the future.
krimynal said:same principles apply .... at the beginning they were there to instruct and mentor , but when it comes down to actually make it happen , you need to follow them , that's a pretty basic and simple fact ... Yet the opposition is trying as hard as they can to make it sound SO bad , to me they just look completely stupid , but that's my personal opinion !
And if it wasn't for this little quote in the House of Commons ....upandatom said:.... it should be
1. Teach in the class/lesson plan/battle plan
2. Send them out to the front, ACCOMPANY
3. Attack or defend an objective. WATCH (Fire back if you are under contact)
4. Have the Iraqi explain how it went down. (Let them perform their own AAR and see how they thought it went)
5. Give the Mentors assessment (inform them of weaknesses and strengths and how they can play their strengths to their advantage)
6. Repeat
.... the wordsmiths wouldn't have as much to wordsmith about. It's all about calling a spade a spade, and when people are willing to do so, or not..... 30 Sept 2014, Question Period, House of Commons:
....Right Hon. Stephen Harper (Prime Minister, CPC): Mr. Speaker, I said “ advise and assist the Iraqis”. [English] If I could just use the terminology in English, it is quite precise. It is to advise and to assist. It is not to accompany. I think that was laid out before the parliamentary committee ..... Mr. Speaker, I just said that Canadian soldiers are not accompanying the Iraqi forces into combat ....
Rifleman62 said:A fellow I went to high school with, who joined the Light Infantry in the UK, did that. Pretty good wages.
upandatom said:Thats how the Brits operation in IMATT in Sierra Leone, they were making some crazy amount of money 75k Pounds year plus, and it was treated more like a posting, they would spend 1-2 years, but lived on the Compound. It was a great go for them.
From what I gather is they were paid normal wages by the UK and then a "loan wage" for the SL Government capped it off that was basically the Brits giving them more money (Aid money or whatever)that was given the the SL.