Great pics!Some photos taken early this morning out at Kingston's Norman Rogers Airport. I had a video of the BH taking off, but to large for the server.
And I still maintain, they did a great job on the paint
Great pics!Some photos taken early this morning out at Kingston's Norman Rogers Airport. I had a video of the BH taking off, but to large for the server.
Improve commonality sounds good, and it is - but what airframes do we currently have that duplicate the capabilities of another?Parliament should start by actually letting the CAF improve commonality in its helo fleet. At least these other agencies don't end up having to train their support workforce. They can rely on contracted maintenance.
100 % correct. Focus on what the needs are and less on elections.Like Chinooks and M777s, kit and clothing can be obtained in record time when there is political will.
Meanwhile, provincial and municipal forces don’t appear to be as hamstrung in procuring equipment as the feds…Three things on RCMP procurement:
- Members have been waiting on new pistols and blue shirts among othe things, for 10 years (ish). Some indecision by senior management and lots of issues with PW&PC.
- Federal Policing have been asking for a platform like the BHs for a few years. Issues with senior mgmt and political will held it up. Which is what has held Fed Pol back from lots of good policing.
- The decision to approve the BH leases was due to present pressures.
Like Chinooks and M777s, kit and clothing can be obtained in record time when there is political will.
Keep the Chinooks, Retire the Cyclones, Buy 60 more AW 101's in Maritime configuration ( 35) Tactical Lift (25) and then buy 60Improve commonality sounds good, and it is - but what airframes do we currently have that duplicate the capabilities of another?
The Griffons, Chinooks, Cormorants, and Cyclones all perform very different roles. I don't know what 2 airframes could realistically be consolidated into 1...
(Remember, it was the government's desire to improve CAF helo fleet commonality that led us to having the Griffon in the first place - or so I've heard)
Have you seen our pistol procurement?Just doesn't feel that way sometimes...ya know?
The common denominator here is Public Service and Procurement Canada. If I was king for a day I'd Elon the f*** out of them.Meanwhile, provincial and municipal forces don’t appear to be as hamstrung in procuring equipment as the feds…
Have you seen our pistol procurement?
The common denominator here is Public Service and Procurement Canada. If I was king for a day I'd Elon the f*** out of them.
Have you seen our pistol procurement?
The common denominator here is Public Service and Procurement Canada. If I was king for a day I'd Elon the f*** out of them.
And AW149s to replace the Griffons. And maybe another 15 AW101s in either 612 or 615 SAR configuration to boost the Cormorant fleet.Keep the Chinooks, Retire the Cyclones, Buy 60 more AW 101's in Maritime configuration ( 35) Tactical Lift (25) and then buy 60Merlin's and Cormorants can be combined, probably half the Griffons replaced by cargo version of the AgustaWestland AW101.
Chinooks remain and perhaps increased in numbers slowly, in perhaps 5 years from now.
I was supportive of buying Blackhawks to replace the remaining Griffons, but I think we will wait 5 years as well.
Buy 6-12x Bell 429's (built in Canada) paint them gray and owned by TC who supplies aircraft, pilot and mechanic to the AOPS as required.
H-145 's in a Base Flight (12) and armed Recce/SOF (48).
We are retiring a number of Combat Aviation Brigades. As such you could get a fantastic deal on some slightly used Blackhawks.And AW149s to replace the Griffons. And maybe another 15 AW101s in either 612 or 615 SAR configuration to boost the Cormorant fleet.
The AW149 has almost double the range and troop capacity. And Sikorsky declined to bid in the British New Medium Helicopter project.We are retiring a number of Combat Aviation Brigades. As such you could get a fantastic deal on some slightly used Blackhawks.
While I get the Canadian angst about America, it’s the best UH out there.
Realistically as soon as you add crew chiefs for Door guns - you end up with 1 more GIB than the Blackhawk.The AW149 has almost double the range and troop capacity. And Sikorsky declined to bid in the British New Medium Helicopter project.
![]()
Airbus Helicopters and Sikorsky walk away from UK NMH contest at 11th hour
Leonardo Helicopters is the sole remaining bidder for the UK's ongoing New Medium Helicopter (NMH) contest after rivals Airbus Helicopters and Sikorsky confirmed they were withdrawing from the competition.www.flightglobal.com
i think doubling our SAR assets is a non starter. it was enough work to get to the 16And AW149s to replace the Griffons. And maybe another 15 AW101s in either 612 or 615 SAR configuration to boost the Cormorant fleet.
We don't buy used if it's nearly new.Realistically as soon as you add crew chiefs for Door guns - you end up with 1 more GIB than the Blackhawk.
My point on Blackhawks was given the downsizing of the Aviation Brigades down here, there will be some low blade hour ones available at a discount.
I dealt with Ontario's Treasury Board (former Management Board) on a few large-dollar projects and while they weren't a fun bunch to deal with and are extremely risk-averse, they were never obstructionist like I get the sense the federal counterpart is. We didn't have a version of the current Ministry of Public and Business Service Delivery and Procurement back then; Ontario Shared Services Bureau was in its infancy and was still in the process of screwing up everybody's computer needs.Meanwhile, provincial and municipal forces don’t appear to be as hamstrung in procuring equipment as the feds…
But if we start to shift assets to the Arctic won't there be a legitimate reason to need more SAR?i think doubling our SAR assets is a non starter. it was enough work to get to the 16
Any reason why all of them are within 100+/- km's of the US border? Strictly because that is where the population is?i think we are already shirking out obligations for Arctic SAR. Should we have/do more? Sure. I'll be surprised if we do
an obvious additional base doesnt really suggest itself
View attachment 91995