• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

Replacing the Subs

Ahhh, but you're missing the hidden brilliance of this plan!

We contract for six of each but then we Canadianize them both so extensively that we effectively end up with 12 x uniquely Canadian subs of essentially the same design!

Added bonus? We're fast-tracked on our goal of reaching 5% GDP on defence spending!
Gawd no! Some people in Ottawa may actually read this blog and take you seriously thinking what a great idea.
 

CEO of TKMS coming onto CBC to give an interview which I feel did not go especially well.

Going into an interview with a major Canadian media organization in 2026 and being entirely unwilling to give even a preliminary jobs figure tied to your bid does not reflect well on TKMS. It doesn't take a genius to look at how much good publicity Saab received recently by sharing their jobs projections for the Gripen bid (even if they are nonsensical). When your competitor (Hanwha) is willing to share figures but you sit there and say "well we sent it to the Government but we're not willing to share it with the Canadian taxpayer now", it does not look very positive for your trustworthiness as a public partner. Of course any of these jobs figures are typically heavily inflated and ultimately unrealistic however, simultaneously being unwilling to share anything while also saying your bid will do a lot more than your opponents makes you look smug, dismissive and frankly unserious. You clearly have figures internally which you said you've provided to Government, but you are unwilling to be transparent to the Canadian public like your competitor.

TKMS has also upped its claim of boat delivery, now stating they can provide 2 boats by 2032 instead of the previously claimed 1. With that being said however, the stipulation is seemingly attached that Canada needs to enter into talks with both Germany and Norway to get their own boats from the active production line. Norway has already taken over German boats and pushed the German delivery dates far back when they entered the program, but they expect Canada to enter in this late in the game and fight for the scraps in a clogged up production line? Given the defence situation in Europe and the delays to the program already, it seems very unlikely Norway will give up their boats, and Germany is already delayed from Norway as previously stated. Hanwha is still sticking to its claims they can deliver the first boat to Canada by 2032 with another three boats being delivered by 2035, which is double the German offering (+1 year) without this requirement to fight for production slots separately from the bid.

It is positive to see TKMS pushing back against the idea of a split fleet as being suboptimal and obviously affecting the benefits packages they have on offer, but overall the interview was a relatively soft pitch that they seem to have fumbled in my opinion.
 
Yea my main concern is that the Germans want to fill their order book to the brim and figure out how to deliver later. I think they are also used to being the "premium pick" and not used to having to compete either for subs or for MBT's.

SK knows that our order is super important for them and would very likely cement further orders, therefore it's a "whole of government issue". They will pull the stops out to deliver subs and support.
 
Back
Top