The Great Gun Control Debate- 2.0

[RedFive]

Mea culpa. The point still stands though.

Why is LE issued firearms that are designed to kill the most amount of people in the shortest amount of time?

Because sometimes, that's our job.

There is more than one name on the RCMP Memorial in Regina there because they were hopelessly outgunned in the rolling gun fight.

 

[Fishbone Jones]

Because sometimes, that's our job.

There is more than one name on the RCMP Memorial in Regina there because they were hopelessly outgunned in the rolling gun fight.

I am referring to trudeaus reasoning for banning them. I doubt LE were issued them to kill the most amount of people in the least amount of time as the government professes that is the only reason for banning them.

I am not putting any blame on LE. I hold the deepest respect for anyone in uniform. I'm pointing out the double standard of the current government.

Perhaps not very eloquently though.

 

[Lumber]

Semi autos are no more dangerous than that .22 Cooey bolt gun in the corner. They are inanimate until a lunatic or untrained person picks it up and starts fucking with it. The operator is the dangerous portion of the equation.

Yes they are. Take some disgruntled young adult who's got an infatuation with mass killings and a beef with the world. He can do a lot more damage and keep LE at bay more effectively with an AR-10 than he could we a Cooey.

 

[Colin Parkinson]

Yes they are. Take some disgruntled young adult who's got an infatuation with mass killings and a beef with the world. He can do a lot more damage and keep LE at bay more effectively with an AR-10 than he could we a Cooey.

I would be impressed if he had an AR-10, not exactly common.

Quite the epidemic we are having with long guns of all types

 

[Eaglelord17]

Yes they are. Take some disgruntled young adult who's got an infatuation with mass killings and a beef with the world. He can do a lot more damage and keep LE at bay more effectively with an AR-10 than he could we a Cooey.

And he could still do more damage with a F150 than either one of those. Vehicle attacks are more dangerous than firearms attacks.

 

[Cloud Cover]

And he could still do more damage with a F150 than either one of those. Vehicle attacks are more dangerous than firearms attacks.

Believe it or not, there was a move underway in British Columbia to allow local councils to ban private non commercial ownership and use of large pick up trucks from urban areas- under the guise of pedestrian and public safety.

 

[CadNav]

I would be impressed if he had an AR-10, not exactly common.

Quite the epidemic we are having with long guns of all types

View attachment 97993

That might be for various reasons, not necessarily that they're more dangerous; it could be because handguns are more popular, because they're cheaper, or of various causal factors

 

[Quirky]

Believe it or not, there was a move underway in British Columbia to allow local councils to ban private non commercial ownership and use of large pick up trucks from urban areas- under the guise of pedestrian and public safety.

What’s considered urban in BC?

 

[Lumber]

I would be impressed if he had an AR-10, not exactly common.

Quite the epidemic we are having with long guns of all types

View attachment 97993

Once again, my point is being conflated. I did not say that long guns, and more specifically semi auto long guns, were the main source of gun deaths in Canada. All I said, and nothing more, was that a person with a semi-auto rifle, and especially a high calibre semi-auto rifle, has the capability to do more damage/cause more deaths and resist LE better than someone with a single shot 22LR (unless Fish was referring to the Cooey 60), especially if they are novice shooter.

 

[Colin Parkinson]

That might be for various reasons, not necessarily that they're more dangerous; it could be because handguns are more popular, because they're cheaper, or of various causal factors

Handguns are generally smuggled in and used by real criminals in nefarious circumstances

 

[Eaglelord17]

That might be for various reasons, not necessarily that they're more dangerous; it could be because handguns are more popular, because they're cheaper, or of various causal factors

It is because criminals mainly use handguns (primarily smuggled from the States) to commit crimes. They are used because they are easy to conceal, walking around with a long gun gets noticed very quickly.

Most shotgun/rifle homicides are generally domestics which if they didn’t have that firearm still likely would be done by knife, hammer, etc.

Believe it or not, there was a move underway in British Columbia to allow local councils to ban private non commercial ownership and use of large pick up trucks from urban areas- under the guise of pedestrian and public safety.

And environmental controls. Remember a prison is theoretically the safest place around.