• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

The Great Gun Control Debate- 2.0

Right now, Gary and Nathalie and the rest of Public Safety are wargaming a nuclear option to ensure this key promise in the Liberal campaign is delivered upon. Thia is a no-fail task.

No one, and I mean no one should be looking for a silver lining in this.

I am hearing rumblings thay Poly and the LPC are in a bit of panic over this now. It seems the resistance from PDs and Prov Govs is meaning something.

Perhaps there is hope for our PDs yet.

Carney has an off ramp here.

Once again, my point is being conflated. I did not say that long guns, and more specifically semi auto long guns, were the main source of gun deaths in Canada. All I said, and nothing more, was that a person with a semi-auto rifle, and especially a high calibre semi-auto rifle, has the capability to do more damage/cause more deaths and resist LE better than someone with a single shot 22LR (unless Fish was referring to the Cooey 60), especially if they are novice shooter.

You lose people in your statement when you cant get the technical details right. Much like people need long winded pontifications ad nauseum on this site to flex their English degree.

AR10s... If I had one ain't no one taking that.
 
Yes they are. Take some disgruntled young adult who's got an infatuation with mass killings and a beef with the world. He can do a lot more damage and keep LE at bay more effectively with an AR-10 than he could we a Cooey.
What about a 300 Winchester magnum with a 16 power scope, and pump action shotgun. Both hunting platforms πŸ˜Άβ€πŸŒ«οΈ
 
I am hearing rumblings thay Poly and the LPC are in a bit of panic over this now. It seems the resistance from PDs and Prov Govs is meaning something.

Perhaps there is hope for our PDs yet.

Carney has an off ramp here.



You lose people in your statement when you cant get the technical details right. Much like people need long winded pontifications ad nauseum on this site to flex their English degree.

AR10s... If I had one ain't no one taking that.
And just what technical details did I get wrong?
 
What about a 300 Winchester magnum with a 16 power scope, and pump action shotgun. Both hunting platforms πŸ˜Άβ€πŸŒ«οΈ
They would also be more deadly/dangerous than a bolt action, tube fed 22. Worse than an AR-10 or an SKS? It would probably depend on the situation.
 
And just what technical details did I get wrong?

I suppose you actually didnt get any wrong. But using an AR10 as an example is laughable. Mea culpa.

It screams of the sweaty, flustered, keyboard smashing of an anti... To me...
 
Back
Top