The Great Gun Control Debate- 2.0

[OldSolduer]

What are “reasonable grounds”?

 

[Halifax Tar]

What are “reasonable grounds”?

CFO:
"I see you have a PAL. I'm going to come in and inspect your compliance to the laws."

 

[IKnowNothing]

What are “reasonable grounds”?

Depends how hard they want to push. But I think it would be hard to argue against any of the conditions/groupings I listed being reasonable grounds. The ammo one is by far the weakest.

 

[Lumber]

What are “reasonable grounds”?

CFO:
"I see you have a PAL. I'm going to come in and inspect your compliance to the laws."

"We saw your post on army.ca, and have reasonable grounds to believe you may be conceiling a prohibited weapon."

 

[Halifax Tar]

"We saw your post on army.ca, and have reasonable grounds to believe you may be conceiling a prohibited weapon."

Is this a threat ?

I am a little sensitive, I will walk that back.

 

[Colin Parkinson]

"We saw your post on army.ca, and have reasonable grounds to believe you may be conceiling a prohibited weapon."

Most likely "We saw your posts on CGN and believe you are concealing a prohibited firearm." They will troll there first.

 

[Halifax Tar]

Most likely "We saw your posts on CGN and believe you are concealing a prohibited firearm." They will troll there first.

I find that site very difficult to peruse. I like its EE and some of the stuff in the MILSURP sections, but as much as I can empathize with the situation it can get very vile and combative.

 

[Lumber]

Is this a threat ?

I am a little sensitive, I will walk that back.

Yeesh. I'm on your side on this bud. Thank you for walking it back.

 

[Jarnhamar]

Yeesh. I'm on your side on this bud. Thank you for walking it back.

After the number of semiautomatics we bought and sold to each other? I should hope so


I can't see the government going after gun owners for non compliance until it's an election year. Then watch out.

 

[Eaglelord17]

I find that site very difficult to peruse. I like its EE and some of the stuff in the MILSURP sections, but as much as I can empathize with the situation it can get very vile and combative.

If it is outside of the EE, milsurps section, antiques, or gunsmithing, I basically ignore it’s existence.

As much as some might think I take extreme stance (mine is more focused on who has access as opposed to what is accessed), many on there would consider me a ‘commie libtard’ or other such titles.

 

[Lumber]

After the number of semiautomatics we bought and sold to each other? I should hope so


I can't see the government going after gun owners for non compliance until it's an election year. Then watch out.

Oh I see what you did there you sly dog you.

 

[OldSolduer]

What are the chances the Federales hire a bunch of retired cops and give them the authority to door knock?

 

[Jarnhamar]

What are the chances the Federales hire a bunch of retired cops and give them the authority to door knock?

Why hire retired cops when you can hire cops to do it as a paid duty? That way police departments aren't enforcing it, just their officers doing side gigs -like paid security at a concert.

 

[IKnowNothing]

As much as some might think I take extreme stance (mine is more focused on who has access as opposed to what is accessed),

We really only differ in that I think some "what's" are worthy of tracking more closely so that more scrutiny can be applied to the "who's" efficiently

 

[suffolkowner]

With the amount of police departments rejecting involvement and the provinces its amounting to a discrediting of the federal position

 

[Colin Parkinson]

I can't see the government going after gun owners for non compliance until it's an election year. Then watch out.

Yes if they actually do this, the vote pinata becomes sterile and unproductive.

 

[Haggis]

Why hire retired cops when you can hire cops to do it as a paid duty? That way police departments aren't enforcing it, just their officers doing side gigs -like paid security at a concert.

If a specific police service stands against the scheme, will they allow public resources (i.e. vehicles, equipment and facilities) to support it?

Secondly, many of the police unions are also standing against the scheme and a lot have sections of their collective agreements that govern paid-duty tasks such as this. If this comes to pass, I expect the unions would get more involved.