The RCAF's Next Generation Fighter (CF-188 Replacement)

[Maxman1]

"The members believed the presence of US Navy nuclear-powered ships' presence in Victoria Harbour posed potential health and environmental risks to the city."<a href="Raging Grannies - Wikipedia"><span>[</span>3<span>]</span></a>

Looks like the 'tin foil' logic is alive and well within the group.

Is that Elizabeth May's riding?

 

[Czech_pivo]

Is that Elizabeth May's riding?

lol, could be, could be.

 

[Underway]

Is that Elizabeth May's riding?

She's Sannich Islds IIRC, not Victoria.

 

[Maxman1]

Probably the same group of crazies.

 

[RangerRay]

Probably the same group of crazies.

The downside of living in Victoria are all the flakey people that live there.

 

[dapaterson]

The downside of living in Victoria are all the flakey people that live there.

Do you live there ?

 

[RangerRay]

Never permanently!

 

[Good2Golf]

We exercise a major emission of nuclear material because its easier to practice big and then scale down. But again, the chances are basically zero of that happening outside of kinetic action against the submarine itself.

Ironically, CAF/RCN mitigation activities pale in comparison comparison to theories and consequence management that OPG and NBP have in place for incidents. Those two moths also take installation (dare some say NCI) security more seriously than the CAF [SAD].