KevinB
Army.ca Relic
- Reaction score
- 29,390
- Points
- 1,260
Oh I know. But I just wanted to toss gasolineIf you stop there, you're not getting the whole picture![]()

Oh I know. But I just wanted to toss gasolineIf you stop there, you're not getting the whole picture![]()
Minnesota should be part of Greater Manitoba.Oh I know. But I just wanted to toss gasoline
Those look like Texas Rangers swinging in the wind.....Hey the Uranium Mines need workers back to the pit…
View attachment 98277
If the annexation of Canada ultimately results in the nuclear annihilation of the USA, Ill call it a draw.Hey the Uranium Mines need workers back to the pit…
Minnesota should be part of Greater Manitoba.
They're Mounties, changed just enough to avoid any kind of legal action.Those look like Texas Rangers swinging in the wind.....
Maybe to you, but to me, they're Texas Rangers.They're Mounties, changed just enough to avoid any kind of legal action.
No thank you.Minnesota should be part of Greater Manitoba.
They realized what they had done and unleashed and decided "Nuking it from orbit is the only solution"If the annexation of Canada ultimately results in the nuclear annihilation of the USA, Ill call it a draw.
Famously common sights in CanadaMaybe to you, but to me, they're Texas Rangers.
YTZ, this is not directed at you, because I know that you know:
Buying the Gripens requires the US to approve the sale, because the it contains US tech.
How does that free us from the grip of the US?
I do not know how to make this any clearer to the Gripen fanboys.
@ytz pretty much nailed it. The whole sovereignty thing is a bit of a distraction that people have lobbed into the mix. If we wanted sovereignty, we'd have to go ask Dassault for Rafales.
There are different levels of interoperability.Rafale the only reasonable option that is not controlled by the US, but that has categorically proved interoperable up to and including integrated operations from a USN nuclear carrier.
Absolutely there are, but Rafale M is quantitatively more interoperable than Gripen E, would you agree?There are different levels of interoperability.
Not necessarily.Absolutely there are, but Rafale M is quantitatively more interoperable than Gripen E, would you agree?
Mindful that we never operated a CF-188 from a CVN AFAIK, what would you say are the interoperability +/- of both the Rafale and Gripen?Not necessarily.
