• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

The War in Ukraine

If that was some fortifications being built in Bavaria, I’d agree but since it’s being built in Finland, a frontline state against Russia, I’m giving them kudos for preparing for the worst.
Better to kill as many as we enable the Ukrainians to now, than build the Maginot Line 2.0
 

So after all that they ended it early and skipped lunch and have nothing to show for it, doesn't sound like it went well at all. Now we see if Trump tries to memory hole the whole thing or actually apply some of those "severe consequences" on Russia.

Meanwhile, the country with virtually no functioning Navy is branching out into the Caspian.



I don't think the bridge is supposed to look that toasty.
 
Maybe I am just paranoid (but am I paranoid enough?), but I suspect that, even though we didn't see them, to foster amity , Trump let the Russians bring their own film crew and all. Then, he parades Putin right in front of some F-35's loaded with TS gear, none of which (other than the engine intakes) appears to be covered. Western journalist are probably not even paying attention, as it is background noise to them, but the Russian medias - some of which must be spies in disguise - are probably going "Bazinga! Get me lots of high-def close up pics".

Little correction on my own point: Now that I got a better look at them, it was F-22 Raptors. Still ...
 
Been some bolder partisan activity in Melitopol the past few weeks, this is the latest.


-1 General.


The Brits believe it will take Russia an additional 4.4 years and 1,930,000 casualties on top of the current 1,060,000 they have now just to fully capture and occupy the 4 Ukrainian Oblasts they want currently.


And here's an interesting read from the Hudson Institute. A lot of the targets suggested aren't new to those that have been following the war, but there's a couple that might not have been considered by many before.

 
About 20 Tomahawks would effectively destroy Russia's economy and war machine...
Uh… That’s a pretty bold claim, Kev. I think it would take more than 20,000lbs of precisely placed high explosives as a couple dozen one-offs to break Russian economic and logistical resilience. Let’s be real here.
 
Uh… That’s a pretty bold claim, Kev. I think it would take more than 20,000lbs of precisely placed high explosives as a couple dozen one-offs to break Russian economic and logistical resilience. Let’s be real here.
I’m sure that if the Ukrainians took out every single rail bridge over a major/minor river along the Trans Siberian rail network on Jan 1 that Russia would be in some pretty serious trouble tout suite - would 20 Tomahawks make that happen?
 
I’m sure that if the Ukrainians took out every single rail bridge over a major/minor river along the Trans Siberian rail network on Jan 1 that Russia would be in some pretty serious trouble tout suite - would 20 Tomahawks make that happen?
I’m sure they would, but if that was a capability Ukraine realistically had I suspect we’d have seen it by now. I doubt Ukraine is shying away from some hitherto unused highly efficient war-winning deep strike strategy.
 
I’m sure they would, but if that was a capability Ukraine realistically had I suspect we’d have seen it by now. I doubt Ukraine is shying away from some hitherto unused highly efficient war-winning deep strike strategy.
That’s what the Tomahawks are for, lol.
 
Interestingly Ukraine has just revealed photos of a new ‘Flamingo’ missile that purportedly can do 3,000km with a 1,000lb warhead. We’ll see if it’s true.

More info on this including the the only photo of one, which shows that they have at least 2.

 
Back
Top