- Reaction score
- 7,083
- Points
- 1,160
Do they all have to be crewed?
TKMS Type 212CD (Victoria class replacement megathread)
- Thread starter Spencer100
- Start date
Oldgateboatdriver
Army.ca Fixture
- Reaction score
- 6,097
- Points
- 1,040
No. At any given time, four or five of them would be in deep maintenance/refit in the hands of a yard.
- Reaction score
- 4,411
- Points
- 1,040
Two a year with two being mothballed at the 12-15 year mark. Keep them until the 24-30 mark and sell off the half used ships to friendly nations.
In event of war we can have a 48-60 ship fleet of fairly modern well taken care of ships available plus facilities capable of making them at a moments notice.
In peace we have spares and options as well as stable jobs and realistically cost effective manufacturing due to constant known demand/supply.
and you can use the mothballed fleet for loads of training opportunities; win, win
- Reaction score
- 7,083
- Points
- 1,160
Lack of clarity on my part. Do we need 22 x 212CD's or could it be a mix of 212CD's and XLUUV's for example?
I guess it really depends on the concept of operations.
- Reaction score
- 4,411
- Points
- 1,040
The cynic in me seems to be rewarded. Part of the reason I think they went with Germany is because they want to cut the order down once the panic from the States is over.
If they went with South Korea I suspect they wouldn’t have the time frame to cancel some as they would likely get them done quicker.
Halifax Tar
Army.ca Legend
- Reaction score
- 21,021
- Points
- 1,260
I think the post trump effect will reduce more than submarine numbers, sadly.
- Reaction score
- 9,899
- Points
- 1,210
This was always going to be the way. I thought it was going to be 4 + 4 +4. You don't order 12 ships. You order in batches.
It's cost control and allows to restructure the contract in between as well as evolve the ships design between batches.
It never was 12. It was up to 12 (min 8 was subtext).
- Reaction score
- 9,038
- Points
- 1,260
I guess that whoever in the RCN who wrote the report saying we needed 22 subs really should have fudged the numbers to say 30-34 and then maybe we would be getting 12 subs.
Oh well, lesson learned. File it away and dust it off in 35yrs when we'll be doing this all over again.
Still can't shake the feeling that we'll never see 15 Rivers.
- Reaction score
- 2,053
- Points
- 1,160
Speaking of South Korea, they just launched there second KS-III Batch 2 submarine.
South Korea Launches Second KSS-III Batch-II Submarine, ROKS Seo Hui - Naval News
The Republic of Korea Navy held a launching ceremony for Seo Hui, the second Jang Bogo(KSS)-III Batch-II submarine, at Hanwha Ocean’s shipyard in Geoje on November 3.
www.navalnews.com
Gordon Dundas/
Member
- Reaction score
- 291
- Points
- 780
Once Trump's gone I wouldn't be surprised if the Defence budget gets gutted. If we're serious about dealing with Europe. We'll do it quietly and hope they either don't notice or don't care.
Halifax Tar
Army.ca Legend
- Reaction score
- 21,021
- Points
- 1,260
- Reaction score
- 7,554
- Points
- 1,120
I had that discussion last night - I pointed out that the only reason our budget rose in the recent past was because the orange dude called everyone out, and when things don't look so orange outside, there will be far less impetus to appease, and far less money thrown at looking to solve problems.
Someone mentioned being concerned about whether or not we get 15 RCDs....I don't know if we've ordered any of the long-lead items yet beyond the first 3. (Gearboxes/etc)
That will be a real indicator in my opinion.
Someone mentioned being concerned about whether or not we get 15 RCDs....I don't know if we've ordered any of the long-lead items yet beyond the first 3. (Gearboxes/etc)
That will be a real indicator in my opinion.
- Reaction score
- 7,083
- Points
- 1,160
Your spidey-senses were very close on this one..
- Reaction score
- 9,038
- Points
- 1,260
100%
I've seen nothing beyond the first 3 of anything.
I'm totally spit balling here, 6 Rivers, 12 CDC's, 8 Subs and 2 JSS is what we could end up with if you want to be a pessimist - remove 3 River's and you could be a worst case pessimist.
I'm not counting the AOPS because thy are not warships and if funding becomes an issue down the road, as well as crewing, stripping off the 25mm and selling off the high-end sensors/radar and poof - they are now a CCG vessel.
Similar threads
