Singh ran a defense lawyer practice, drives a Maserati and wears Rolex. I don’t understand why anyone truly thinks he’s substantially motivated by a relative pittance of a six year Parliamentary pension at age 65? He probably stands to make more money out of Parliament than in it.
I'd assume that he's also smart enough to understand that a gold plated pension is a nice thing to have in your back pocket, even when you have other wealth.
Why do we always have to pretend that things are black and white? Singh can be a successful trust fund/inheritance baby, and also want a pension... Just as I can be a working class "loser" smart enough to understand a government pension is a way to elevate my circumstances.
Fun thought: the next PM, for at least a brief period, will probably be chosen by a party leadership campaign in which voting is open to non-citizens and minors.
Overtly open... Isn't the foreign interference report coming out at the end of this month, which may well detail covert efforts by non-citizens in prior party shenanigans.
Overtly open... Isn't the foreign interference report coming out at the end of this month, which may well detail covert efforts by non-citizens in prior party shenanigans.
Not sure, I know they’re reporting government but I don’t know offhand if it’s also to be made public. I don’t know if they’re doing a classified and a redacted version.
Singh ran a defense lawyer practice, drives a Maserati and wears Rolex. I don’t understand why anyone truly thinks he’s substantially motivated by a relative pittance of a six year Parliamentary pension at age 65? He probably stands to make more money out of Parliament than in it.
Fun thought: the next PM, for at least a brief period, will probably be chosen by the United Front Work Department a party leadership campaign in which voting is open to non-citizens and minors.
Singh ran a defense lawyer practice, drives a Maserati and wears Rolex. I don’t understand why anyone truly thinks he’s substantially motivated by a relative pittance of a six year Parliamentary pension at age 65? He probably stands to make more money out of Parliament than in it.
I’m pretty much of this opinion. The guy lead the party without an MP salary or pension for what? Two years?
I suspect there is also a lot more at play.
1) pressure from his own caucus who stand to lose pensions and potentially their jobs. I bet the aftermarket world for most NDP mps isn’t anywhere near lucrative as it is for Conservative or Liberals
2) campaign readiness. The party has little money to mount any sort of effective election campaign. My guess is that this is the main driver and may be the message the party is telling JS.
Fun thought: the next PM, for at least a brief period, will probably be chosen by a party leadership campaign in which voting is open to non-citizens and minors.
Singh ran a defense lawyer practice, drives a Maserati and wears Rolex. I don’t understand why anyone truly thinks he’s substantially motivated by a relative pittance of a six year Parliamentary pension at age 65? He probably stands to make more money out of Parliament than in it.
Any 'bolding' and 'italics' added below are from me.
At what age can Members receive their retirement allowance? Members who have accumulated at least 6 years of pensionable service may receive an unreduced retirement allowance, as follows:
at age 55 for pensionable service accumulated before December 31, 2015; or
at age 65 for pensionable service accumulated as of January 1, 2016.
Benefits paid under the pension plan are calculated using a formula that is based on the participant’s pensionable service and annual pensionable earnings over the five consecutive years of highest-paid pensionable service. The current benefit accrual rate is 3% per year of service. Benefits for pensionable service accumulated as of January 1, 2016, have been coordinated with the Canada Pension Plan (CPP) and the Québec Pension Plan (QPP).
Jagmeet Singh
Party Leader
$271,700
The above is valid as of this past summer.
As of March 31, 2020, the 'average' pension paid to a CDN MP is 69,842 - no small amount - and that's 5 yrs old so it has only gone up.
Any 'bolding' and 'italics' added below are from me.
At what age can Members receive their retirement allowance? Members who have accumulated at least 6 years of pensionable service may receive an unreduced retirement allowance, as follows:
at age 55 for pensionable service accumulated before December 31, 2015; or
at age 65 for pensionable service accumulated as of January 1, 2016.
Benefits paid under the pension plan are calculated using a formula that is based on the participant’s pensionable service and annual pensionable earnings over the five consecutive years of highest-paid pensionable service. The current benefit accrual rate is 3% per year of service. Benefits for pensionable service accumulated as of January 1, 2016, have been coordinated with the Canada Pension Plan (CPP) and the Québec Pension Plan (QPP).
Jagmeet Singh
Party Leader
$271,700
The above is valid as of this past summer.
As of March 31, 2020, the 'average' pension paid to a CDN MP is 69,842 - no small amount - and that's 5 yrs old so it has only gone up.
Singh’s 46. I’m not convinced any of what’s going on here is particularly motivated by being vested into the MP pension come age 65. Not with his degree of existing wealth.
Don’t get me wrong, it’s better than a kick in the nuts with wet mukluks, but I think he has far more significant and short term interests and benefits than that.
Overtly open... Isn't the foreign interference report coming out at the end of this month, which may well detail covert efforts by non-citizens in prior party shenanigans.
If I understand the process correctly, still not too late for bots of all persuasions to get their Team Red memberships - enter now, enter often, operators are standing by!
I'm about 2/3 the way through this (caveat: it is marked ~3 1/2 hours long, but the first 30 minutes or so is black screen as they set up to do the live cast last night), and enjoyed so far 1) a former Team Red party director explaining what happens next on the party's side (hint: senior poobahs can change the rules to speed things up if needed, and it appears JT made his announcement before the party apparatus could even set up the process), and 2) Michelle Rempel-Garner explaining in detail what Team Blue has planned coming up, both campaigning (any leadership contender is cut of the same cloth as JT, so they can still sorta just fight JT) and governing ...
Singh’s 46. I’m not convinced any of what’s going on here is particularly motivated by being vested into the MP pension come age 65. Not with his degree of existing wealth.
Don’t get me wrong, it’s better than a kick in the nuts with wet mukluks, but I think he has far more significant and short term interests and benefits than that.
Overtly open... Isn't the foreign interference report coming out at the end of this month, which may well detail covert efforts by non-citizens in prior party shenanigans.
Not sure, I know they’re reporting government but I don’t know offhand if it’s also to be made public. I don’t know if they’re doing a classified and a redacted version.
New Liberal leader will face an electorate looking for answers to financial and health care challenges January 7, 2025 – This week Canadians received the news that many have been expecting for weeks, that Prime Minister Justin Trudeau would be resigning his position as Liberal leader. Alongside...
angusreid.org
"Part One: Trudeau’s final days as PM
Declining approval and electoral fortunes
Majority say they’re pessimistic about the future of Canada
Part Two: Canada’s changing priorities
Top issues then vs. top issues now
The economy – Canadians’ optimism and pessimism
Some progress on child poverty, but income inequality still a concern
Health care – a system deteriorated
Crime and safety – concern rising
Immigration rises as top issue post pandemic
Canada’s international reputation"
Spoiler alert: lotsa indicators showing worse news now than before
CRA can’t find all the $15B of CERB/IE-ERB/CESB overpayments….but it has no problem moving ahead with un-voted Capital Gains tax increases. Government prorogued? Not a problem. CRA says the government ‘intended’ to increase taxes within a side note in an earlier ways and means motion, so just as good as one of those Bills passed through that pesky and time consuming three readings and a vote each in the House of Commons and Senate for approval. Also, if future governments (like, say the Parliament that forms on March 25 led by Interim Liberal Leader and Acting-PM….Justin Trudeau, approve the tax increases, CRA has saved time grabbing more money from Canadians. Bravo CRA
The federal government says the Canada Revenue Agency will continue to administer the capital gains tax changes proposed in the budget last year, even though they haven't passed in Parliament,
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.