• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

Trump administration 2024-2028

Not sure if this was covered but this seems big.

Trump promises to bring back troops booted for refusing COVID vaccine

Just minutes after returning to office Monday, President Donald Trump vowed to reinstate more than 8,000 troops dismissed from military service for refusing to take the COVID-19 vaccine, promising them back pay that could cost the federal government hundreds of millions of dollars.

Reinstatement plus back pay. Guess that's a good use of the money previously being spent on the WHO.
 
It's an interesting question for Canada, isn't it?

Before the Trump Tariff Tantrum, I was all in for an integrated American/Canadian equipment standard with manufacturing of heavier equipment in the south and more emphasis on smaller item and munitions in the north. I've been trending more and more towards a complete Canadian and comprehensive industry. It doesn't matter to me if it's a US pattern tank or IFV, as long as it is completely manufactured in Canada under licence. We've reached that with the bulk of the ships, I can't see why it can't with the whole range of army equipment. It works in Australia. If the US won't see that our way then I'm sure the South Koreans won't balk at it.

🍻

Join JEF.

Leos, CV90s and BvS10s from the Alaska border to Ukraine.
 
Impact of Trump in the UK

...

Rachel Reeves, the Chancellor, has been shutting down Britain. She is just back from Davos.

Calling for removal of Environmental Impact Assessments and green NGOs amongst other things.


Rachel Reeves has said she will not tolerate blockers from within her own party standing in the way of her plans for growth.

The Chancellor warned Labour MPs and peers not to “put their own interests above those of the country” as she laid out a string of reforms to kick-start the economy.

She said anyone attempting to block the Planning and Infrastructure Bill would be “defying the will of the country and stifle economic growth”.

Labour sources said the strongly-worded message applied to politicians “in either House, Tory or Labour”.

It is understood that Labour MPs, who alone hold the power to block the Bill, are the main target of the warning.

It comes ahead of a major speech on Wednesday in which she will unveil fresh reforms to boost construction of new homes and national infrastructure.

Ms Reeves will announce a major change to planning rules which will mean that the default position is to approve new housing developments near train stations.

The Chancellor will also strip green quangos of their powers to block building, saying they have wielded an “oversized say on the future of our economy”.

Ms Reeves was speaking ahead of the introduction of the new Planning and Infrastructure Bill in the spring which will take an axe to planning red tape.

The Chancellor is widely expected to give the green light to a third runway at Heathrow in a move that will pit her against Sir Sadiq and Mr Miliband.

Ms Reeves will announce on Sunday that she is going to take an axe to the number of bodies that have to be consulted before new housing is approved.

She will impose an immediate moratorium so no new statutory consultees can be created amid accusations they are “clogging up much-needed development”.

Environmental impact assessments are also being scrapped, to be replaced with much “simpler and much clearer” reports that support development.

The Treasury said impact assessments had “become voluminous and costly documents that too often support legal challenges rather than the environment”.

Unfortunately her Left Wing hasn't got the message ---

Her remarks came just hours after dozens of backbenchers strong-armed No 10 into granting them a greater say on new green legislation.

More than 80 Labour MPs had signalled their support for a Liberal Democrat Bill that would have made the UK’s climate and nature targets legally binding.

Downing Street struck the deal with them to avert a rebellion on the proposed law which, if passed, could have been used to thwart new developments.

The Chancellor is widely expected to give the green light to a third runway at Heathrow in a move that will pit her against Sir Sadiq and Mr Miliband.

....


Starmer backpedalling on the Chagos deal that Biden approved.



Likely to make Starmer no friends on his Left.

....


The Commons rebellions against the Prime Minister could be dwarfed next week if, as expected, the SNP forces a vote on compensation for the so-called Waspi women.

Further mutinies are in the pipeline over a third Heathrow runway, climate policies and, potentially, benefit cuts, and the issue of whether Sir Keir could be ousted before the next election is the subject of whispered conversations in Labour circles.

...

Jerry Lee Lewis comes to mind ...

 
Not sure if this was covered but this seems big.

Trump promises to bring back troops booted for refusing COVID vaccine



Reinstatement plus back pay. Guess that's a good use of the money previously being spent on the WHO.
The vaccine mandated was overturned over a year ago and troops who were discharged were to have their records corrected and were eligible to rejoin the services. The response was tepid.

There is the additional issue that notwithstanding the law passed by Congress re the Covid case, the US military, like ours, still has the issue to contend with that vaccinations have, over the last century plus, significantly reduced the rate of death by disease amongst troops deployed to countries and conditions where strange and uncommon diseases flourish. Vaccination has generally been implemented by lawful orders of the chain of command. Individual soldiers risk their own health and their comrades when vaccinations are refused. This issue has become a dog whistle one for the health sciences deniers that permeate the right.

Trump's direction does add the back pay component - although that too has been in front of Congress in excess of a year. So nothing new. Just receiving support from the top.

🍻
 
There is the additional issue that notwithstanding the law passed by Congress re the Covid case, the US military, like ours, still has the issue to contend with that vaccinations have, over the last century plus, significantly reduced the rate of death by disease amongst troops deployed to countries and conditions where strange and uncommon diseases flourish. Vaccination has generally been implemented by lawful orders of the chain of command. Individual soldiers risk their own health and their comrades when vaccinations are refused. This issue has become a dog whistle one for the health sciences deniers that permeate the right.


🍻
We - many years ago - also had an issue with vaccinations. One aircrew refused the anthrax vaccine IIRC. It was a national story.

Any one that denies the effectiveness of vaccines really needs to read up on them. Polio, Smallpox, MMR etc vaccines are highly effective and not deadly - and they do not cause autism.
mRNA vaccines are the newest ones....there are about eight or ten types of vaccines.
 
Any one that denies the effectiveness of vaccines really needs to read up on them.

Got the RSV vaccine recently.

Did not qualify for the publicly funded RSV vaccine program. But, private insurance took care of it.
 
We - many years ago - also had an issue with vaccinations. One aircrew refused the anthrax vaccine IIRC. It was a national story.
That was the Kipling standing court martial in Winnipeg. I played a small role in that. Kipling's counsel, Jay Prober, subpoenaed several high level folks as witnesses including the CDS Gen Maurice Baril. I was hired as a civilian counsel for Baril by the DOJ to have his subpoena quashed which I did successfully.

Kipling won a plea in bar of trial dismissing the charges but the CMAC overturned the dismissal and ordered a new trial. The Director of Military Prosecutions decided it would not be in the public's interest to proceed with a second trial.

IMHO, the CAF can order someone to submit to a vaccination and court martial them for wilfully refusing, without reasonable excuse, to take one voluntarily and to take appropriate career action against them. The legislation (NDA 126) permits that and, as it stands, there is no case law to say otherwise. The CMAC made it clear that the the Kipling decision at the plea in bar was improperly made.

🍻
 
First Nations leader reconsidering stance on Northern Gateway pipeline after Trump’s tariff threats | Globalnews.ca

I'm guessing that pipelines to the Pacific might have an easier time this time. The NDP and the environmentalists wouldn't be able to rely on First Nations support.
Reconsideration firing alright, reconsideration STOPS ....
 
Any one that denies the effectiveness of vaccines really needs to read up on them. Polio, Smallpox, MMR etc vaccines are highly effective and not deadly - and they do not cause autism.
That's the problem. The anti side has all sorts of academics, celebrities and politicians to trot out; including now one in the US Cabinet. Maybe they need a few million dead or permanently disabled from resurgent infectious diseases. I vote for vaccination records at the border.
 
That's the problem. The anti side has all sorts of academics, celebrities and politicians to trot out; including now one in the US Cabinet. Maybe they need a few million dead or permanently disabled from resurgent infectious diseases. I vote for vaccination records at the border.

Can one can be pro vaccination and anti COVID vaccination?

I mean my vaxx book is chocker block with jabs and I'm very cool with that, but I wouldn't have taken the COVID jab if my job wasn't at stake.
 
Can one can be pro vaccination and anti COVID vaccination?

I mean my vaxx book is chocker block with jabs and I'm very cool with that, but I wouldn't have taken the COVID jab if my job wasn't at stake.

I suppose one can. One legitimate concern with the Covid vaccines was they lacked the long-term trial process.
Bingo
 
  • Like
Reactions: QV
We - many years ago - also had an issue with vaccinations. One aircrew refused the anthrax vaccine IIRC. It was a national story.

Any one that denies the effectiveness of vaccines really needs to read up on them. Polio, Smallpox, MMR etc vaccines are highly effective and not deadly - and they do not cause autism.
mRNA vaccines are the newest ones....there are about eight or ten types of vaccines.
All you need to do is take a walk in a cemetery from the 1920s or earlier. The amount of children and young adults in there is mainly due to lack of vaccines. Smallpox, TB (TB is a huge one), Spanish Flu, etc. Society is a victim of our successes on the vaccine front, they were so effective we fail to understand why we need them anymore.
Can one can be pro vaccination and anti COVID vaccination?

I mean my vaxx book is chocker block with jabs and I'm very cool with that, but I wouldn't have taken the COVID jab if my job wasn't at stake.
Yes, it’s a healthcare decision. Like all healthcare decisions there is comfort levels and personally assessed risks. Just like how I believe in the effectiveness of vaccines but also support the rights of others to make decisions for themselves, in the words of a particular movement, ‘my body, my choice’.
I suppose one can. One legitimate concern with the Covid vaccines was they lacked the long-term trial process.
Exactly. Also things such as mixing vaccines which our government recommended and pushed despite having the manufacturers recommend against that and having no actual data supporting the process. We were the world’s Guinea pigs which is something I am never going to forget.
 
Just like how I believe in the effectiveness of vaccines but also support the rights of others to make decisions for themselves, in the words of a particular movement, ‘my body, my choice’.

Now that the Influenza and COVID mandates have both ended, my former employer offers freedom of choice.

Members now have the option of being vaccinated against Influenza and COVID, or "wear full PPE on all respiratory illness calls."
 
Back
Top