Approve Northern Gateway, bring Energy East only as far as Sarina, since Ontario has no issue with Western Canadian Select, and then consume in Ontario. I’d also branch Energy East up to Churchill, so MB can participate in helping Alberta get its oil and gas to market.
And there it is. The PM of Japan just announced from the podium, in the WH, that the US & Japan will be co-operating on the O&G file. There's one of Carney's customers gone. Thanks trudeau.
And there it is. The PM of Japan just announced from the podium that the US & Japan will be co-operating on the O&G file. There's one of Carney's customers gone. Thanks trudeau/guilbeault…
Doesn’t mean Canada can’t pull its head out of its ass and also work with Japan (and other Asian countries), but that will clearly need Trudeau gone and Carney needs to signal that he won’t be an O&G hater after he’s appointed PM…
Is the proponent even interested in resurrecting the project 9 years later? And would all the paperwork have to be done over again? Not questioning the need, just the private sector will at this point in time.
Approve Northern Gateway, bring Energy East only as far as Sarina, since Ontario has no issue with Western Canadian Select, and then consume in Ontario. I’d also branch Energy East up to Churchill, so MB can participate in helping Alberta get its oil and gas to market.
My goal would be to get it down east to Irving, then cut their shipments of foreign oil. Start cutting the heart out of the Laurentien Elites, whose fortunes are predicated on shares in foreign oil companies and countries.
Irving already gets it supply from tankers. Maybe those ships should just come from Churchhill
Is the proponent even interested in resurrecting the project 9 years later? And would all the paperwork have to be done over again? Not questioning the need, just the private sector will at this point in time.
If a responsible government indicated it was supportive of appropriate energy investment, most likely. But what did industry see when JT & Co. rolled into town in 2015? Cancellations and policy of explicitly reducing Canada’s O&G output. I wouldn’t have bailed too. Canadian government needs to rebuild trust with the energy sector.
Iowa and Nebraska are going to be real happy. The US/ Japan just said they have a deal for ethanol also. That's made from corn if anyone didn't know that. O&G and now agriculture.
Japan has only been in the White House today for a few hours. Two energy deals waiting for contracts and logistics.
My goal would be to get it down east to Irving, then cut their shipments of foreign oil. Start cutting the heart out of the Laurentien Elites, whose fortunes are predicated on shares in foreign oil companies and countries.
Irving already gets it supply from tankers. Maybe those ships should just come from Churchhill
Random thinking last night of past times in Northern Ontario.
What happens if Canada goes to the US and dusts off the old plans to expand the lock sizes for the St. Lawrence Seaway? This would be a bi-national win allowing for larger shipping direct into the US cities of Chicago, Milwaukee, Minneapolis, and others...
Now combine that with oil storage depot in Thunder Bay or Sault Ste. Marie (due to rail line bottlenecks there). Add a second into Churchill. I get that it won't be a Panamax sized super tanker but is it worth the expansion from 1950's era Great Lake shipping limits to help increase product flow?
TransMountain is public saying shipping costs for product down that line is around ~$10/barrel CAD.
There is currently ~$14/barrel USD difference between WCS (~59 USD) and WTI (~ 71 USD) oil grades or a 17% difference in savings. That's also the equivalent to $20 CAD. If you're comparing it to European Brent crude its' about 5% more at ~ 74 USD.
Even if you doubled your transportation costs for WCS to a terminal you're still 10% cheaper than WTI oil. How much infrastructure pays off if that is the price gain long term in both employment, revenue gains (royalties), market tolls, and increased taxes?
Approve Northern Gateway, bring Energy East only as far as Sarina, since Ontario has no issue with Western Canadian Select, and then consume in Ontario. I’d also branch Energy East up to Churchill, so MB can participate in helping Alberta get its oil and gas to market.
Sarnia is an awkward location to reach as the pipeline must go through Michigan or (to stay in Canada) the long way around Lake Huron. Reasonable if the objective is to connect to existing refinery infrastructure. If the intent is just to put product on boats, maybe aim for Cornwall.
View attachment 91058
An artist's conception of the proposed LNG floating liquefaction plant planned to be built near Kitimat, B.C. It is one of the 18 projects the provincial government plans to fast track. Photo by Cedar LNG
The list includes mining projects criticized by First Nations groups in B.C. and Alaska, and an LNG project opposed by environmentalists
nationalpost.com
View attachment 91061
Prodigy Clean Energy and its partners hope to produce floating nuclear power stations that, like in this illustration, could dock in remote Arctic communities and supply less emissions-intensive power than the diesel-fired plants they use now.Supplied by Prodigy Clean Energy
Diesel is the only way to keep the lights on in many remote Arctic towns. A new project wants to offer a greener option – but first it has to assuage safety and cost concerns and compete with renewables
www.theglobeandmail.com
So, if they can contemplate floating SMRs behind berm in ice-infested arctic waters why not float an LNG plant off shore in Hudson's or James Bay? With or without the SMR?
Double Acting Tanker. The Christophe de Margerie-class ice-breaking LNG carriers are built by DSME (Daewo Shipbuilding Marine Engineering) for the Yamal LNG project. Image courtesy of Dmitrii Lobusov
In honour of our 40th anniversary, we thought it would be fitting to go back to our roots and tell the untold story of how Vard Marine came to be. It is a tale of our company before it was known as Vard Marine, a tale of hardship and failure but also of hope and success, and a tale of the significan
Sarnia is an awkward location to reach as the pipeline must go through Michigan or (to stay in Canada) the long way around Lake Huron. Reasonable if the objective is to connect to existing refinery infrastructure. If the intent is just to put product on boats, maybe aim for Cornwall.
Let’s do both…pipeline curving back around to Sarnia (refining for internal consumer consumption in Ontario) and ALSO extending to Cornwall (transshipping to NB and exporting Eastward).
Under the draft, by Feb. 28 the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, DoD components, military departments, combatant commands and the Missile Defense Agency (MDA) are to put together three "scalable reference architectures" for "small, medium and large options" for the shield using "kinetic...
Doesn’t mean Canada can’t pull its head out of its ass and also work with Japan (and other Asian countries), but that will clearly need Trudeau gone and Carney needs to signal that he won’t be an O&G hater after he’s appointed PM…
Trump hails ‘cherished alliance’ with Japan after gas deal
Donald Trump has expressed confidence that America’s relationship with Japan will flourish after he agreed a major energy deal the Asian economy.
Japan will soon begin importing a record amount of new shipments of American liquefied natural gas, he said.
“We’ve opened the sale of LNG immediately,” he said. “Japan in particular, we’re very happy that they’re going to start immediately,” he said.
Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba said that Japan was also interested in importing bio ethanol, ammonia and other resources at what he called a stable price.
Last year, Joe Biden blocked new permits for LNG exports, a move cheered by climate activists.
In 2022, total annual U.S. natural gas imports were about 3.02 Tcf (8.28 Bcf/d), which was about 8% more than in 2021 and the highest volume since 2017. Some of this imported natural gas may have been exported.
Trump hails ‘cherished alliance’ with Japan after gas deal
Donald Trump has expressed confidence that America’s relationship with Japan will flourish after he agreed a major energy deal the Asian economy.
Japan will soon begin importing a record amount of new shipments of American liquefied natural gas, he said.
“We’ve opened the sale of LNG immediately,” he said. “Japan in particular, we’re very happy that they’re going to start immediately,” he said.
Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba said that Japan was also interested in importing bio ethanol, ammonia and other resources at what he called a stable price.
Last year, Joe Biden blocked new permits for LNG exports, a move cheered by climate activists.
We'll have to do something. Even when PP gains power, it'll take years for us to catch up on infrastructure alone. Is the world willing to wait while we fiddle and fuck around?
Sarnia is an awkward location to reach as the pipeline must go through Michigan or (to stay in Canada) the long way around Lake Huron. Reasonable if the objective is to connect to existing refinery infrastructure. If the intent is just to put product on boats, maybe aim for Cornwall.
It would also depend on whether Sarnia has spare capacity and, if not, is their room for expansion (I doubt it - they're pretty hemmed in). There is also Nanticoke. I don't know about their capacity or space to expand.
Building a refinery from scratch is about $10Bn and would probably take a decade (although probably cheaper and shorter than expanding the Seaway). Do we build on as a nation (I thought PET's PetroCan was a bad idea) or expect the private market to build one which, up until now, none seem too interested. Maybe the people that fund and build these things don't see the long term return.
It would also depend on whether Sarnia has spare capacity and, if not, is their room for expansion (I doubt it - they're pretty hemmed in). There is also Nanticoke. I don't know about their capacity or space to expand.
Building a refinery from scratch is about $10Bn and would probably take a decade (although probably cheaper and shorter than expanding the Seaway). Do we build on as a nation (I thought PET's PetroCan was a bad idea) or expect the private market to build one which, up until now, none seem too interested. Maybe the people that fund and build these things don't see the long term return.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.