The Derecho a couple years ago. Linear near-tornado (and sometimes tornado) strengthen winds that swept across the province over the course of much of the day. Total shit show.Dericho ?

The Derecho a couple years ago. Linear near-tornado (and sometimes tornado) strengthen winds that swept across the province over the course of much of the day. Total shit show.Dericho ?
Ah, yes. You shout and blow trumpets, and the wind they create causes the walls of Dericho to come tumbling down.Windstorm.
I see what you did there.Ah, yes. You shout and blow trumpets, and the wind they create causes the walls of Dericho to come tumbling down.
WOW !The Derecho a couple years ago. Linear near-tornado (and sometimes tornado) strengthen winds that swept across the province over the course of much of the day. Total shit show.
![]()
May 2022 Canadian derecho - Wikipedia
en.m.wikipedia.org
The local councillor yes and even Goldy whom I have no real fondness for opened up her office so people could come get coffee or charge their phones etc
George was solid! Glad he replaced Goldy as MPP.You’re right; that could be fairly described as a minor natural disaster in the riding. Didn’t hear shit from him.
I lived in his riding for seven years, never caught a whiff of him doing or pushing anything local. I’m not saying he never did, just that I’m reasonably attentive and I never noticed it if he did.
I will say in fairness that his constituency assistants did a bang up job helping me sort out a federal survivor benefits issue with Service Canada for a family member of mine.
Balancing act, yes but the acting opposition leader who has US citizenship not outright putting out there he is against AB separating (which most pro separation people I've spoken to want AB to join the US) it's becoming the elephant in the room conservatives need to address.![]()
Andrew Scheer supports united Canada, won’t condemn Alberta separation referendum
The Conservative Leader in the House of Commons says he 'can absolutely advocate for a united Canada,' but won’t specifically condemn a possible referendum on Alberta separation.www.ctvnews.ca
And the balancing act begins…
Balancing act, yes but the acting opposition leader who has US citizenship not outright putting out there he is against AB separating (which most pro separation people I've spoken to want AB to join the US) it's becoming the elephant in the room conservatives need to address.
Unlikely. A "need to address" talking point is usually something invented by people trying to tear a politician or party down. No-one really strained themselves trying to defend Carney against his history of playing "citizen of the world", and the LPC's tendency to lean internationalist/post-nationalist for the past decade has been obvious and did not put them in much danger of "needing to address" it.it's becoming the elephant in the room conservatives need to address.
More importantly a gvt in waiting that refuses to condemn separation…Balancing act, yes but the acting opposition leader who has US citizenship not outright putting out there he is against AB separating (which most pro separation people I've spoken to want AB to join the US) it's becoming the elephant in the room conservatives need to address.
In AB groups are already organizing to try and recall UCP MLA's to potentially force a general election. So far two ridings have begun collecting signatures. With already vacant seats, only 5 MLA's would need to be recalled to potentially force a general election.
This has the risk of becoming the most archetypal example of the CPC pandering unnecessarily for an extra 15-20% of the vote in Alberta that they don’t at all need to win, at the expense of the rest of us asking “what the hell are you doing?”More importantly a gvt in waiting that refuses to condemn separation…
Which if they do it for to long, may kill them in the polls just enough next election cycle to give carney a majorityThis has the risk of becoming the most archetypal example of the CPC pandering unnecessarily for an extra 15-20% of the vote in Alberta that they don’t at all need to win, at the expense of the rest of us asking “what the hell are you doing?”
If the CPC aim to lead Canada there should be zero question about heir opposition to western separatism. It’s not like it would be rocket surgery for them to say “hell no” and then immediately build on it with a constructive message about instead looking to rebuild the relationship so that separatists no longer feel the need. They won’t pull all of them back but they don’t need to. Let the fringe go fringe somewhere. Them walking away doesn’t threaten the CPC at all, but courting them - even tacitly - can and will.
The constant pandering the CPC does to crap like this really sucks.archetypal example of the CPC pandering
A hint maybe of doubling down in his current strategic/tactical approach? After all,once he’s opposition leader again, too easy to go back to opposing, not proposing. I suspect if wax going to broaden his appea, we’d see more of this ..,IThis has the risk of becoming the most archetypal example of the CPC pandering unnecessarily for an extra 15-20% of the vote in Alberta that they don’t at all need to win, at the expense of the rest of us asking “what the hell are you doing?”
Let’s see how his approach unfolds (or not?) and the results.If the CPC aim to lead Canada there should be zero question about heir opposition to western separatism. It’s not like it would be rocket surgery for them to say “hell no” and then immediately build on it with a constructive message about instead looking to rebuild the relationship so that separatists no longer feel the need.
Yeah, so pretty much what I said about voicing opposition to outright separation, but validating the existence of underlying grievances and steering the conversation to how they would heal that fracture and rebuild relationships. But as a political reality they need to recognize that shying away from rejecting separatism, or anything seen as pandering to it, will bear costs in their support elsewhere in Canada. Those costs will probably have a more detrimental net effect on their electoral prospects than any marginal gain in support among Alberta separatists.Conservatives should be expected to support decentralized federation more than progressives. Part of that is taking seriously regional grievances, and the rights of people to exercise some form of self-determination, without panicking and declaring it beyond the pale. And the conservative solution (decentralization/subsidiarity) should be expected to achieve better outcomes for the aim of discouraging separation.