• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

Updated Army Service Dress project

I didn’t say they were - I said that’s the civilian association. I don’t think the average Canada really thinks much about uniforms, maybe the red serge is a national symbol but the idea square rig is ever really thought of seems far fetched. I do t know that any of those uniforms are going to help keep hull techs around if they were told to adopt it though.
a93fgb.jpg
 
Modernized Square rig for ceremonial only. Somehow the UK manages it

36E7770C00000578-3725908-HMS_St_Albans_sailed_into_Portsmouth_Naval_Base_following_its_de-a-45_1470419282760.jpg
 
Get rid of the silk scarf, pockets, better materials, maybe ditch the bellbottoms completely?

If the Aussies and the Bersaglieri ca run around with chickens on their head then the Navy can handle a silk scarf and lanyard under their collar.

As for pockets - keep the bell bottoms and put some in the seams. You could hide a footlong in there.
 
Whatever happens, we must keep that Pith Helmet.

Nothing says 'Don't make me come down there you naughty chaps ...' quite like the good old solar topee ;)


1760494770804.png
 
  • Like
Reactions: ueo
Is tradition now defined as “existed before 1968”? It seems like we’ve had a longer period without most of these dress items, surely that makes it more traditional.
TBFH I don't understand why the scope of the project wasn't solely to get a new uniform (jacket, shirt, and pants).
While the brown boots look good, I am not sure why there needed to be separate colors for Officers/CWO's and the others.
Yes the white vinyl belt was a travesty - so pick a nice brown/black belt and call it a day.

I fail to see why a new beret needed to be acquired? Of course I am also one of the folks who can't fathom why the ranks changed from the common ranks that had been used since unification.
 
Back
Top