MilEME09
Army.ca Fixture
- Reaction score
- 7,304
- Points
- 1,210
Absolutely, I wonder if it would also violate the charter is some way?Good. That’s a bullshit law.

Absolutely, I wonder if it would also violate the charter is some way?Good. That’s a bullshit law.
It’s certainly a violation of section 2; it would be a matter of whether it’s saved by section 1. I suspect not, personally. Clearly the real intent is to prevent a reclaiming of the abandoned “progressive conservative” label. The rest is window dressing.Absolutely, I wonder if it would also violate the charter is some way?
Not paying for new judges while complaining about crime is certainly a choice…Try not to act like the thing you've been called challenge: Impossible
![]()
Danielle Smith says Alberta will withhold funding for judges without more input on selection | Globalnews.ca
Premier Danielle Smith said her government will withhold funds for new judicial appointments in Alberta if the federal government doesn't give the province a say on who is picked.globalnews.ca
Not paying for new judges while complaining about crime is certainly a choice…
Smith says the collaboration would help ensure the appointments “appropriately reflect Alberta’s distinct legal traditions,” and strengthen public confidence in the administration of justice.
I'm still trying to figure out what these legal traditions are.
I'm sorry but corruption and incompetence are supposed to be bugs in the system not a feature.I'm still trying to figure out what these legal traditions are.
The most cited decisions out of Alberta (which can be a useful metric for any here the influential case law is to be found) tend to focus on administrative sanctions for impaired drivers, oil and gas, and sovereign citizens. Not sure that’s enough of a ‘distinct legal tradition’ to claim any special additional role in the appointment of superior court judges.I'm still trying to figure out what these legal traditions are.
That study could not be more subjective bullshit if it tried.Well done Premier Smith:
![]()
Measuring the Fiscal Performance of Canada’s Premiers, 2026
www.fraserinstitute.org
If?That study could not be more subjective bullshit if it tried.
That study could not be more subjective bullshit if it tried.
Using radically different timeframes for comparison makes it unserious.Yeah sure
Do you have any other reference material to compare?
I've found that there are two Fraser Institutes.Using radically different timeframes for comparison makes it unserious.
