Well aware. It's why I'm in for an interesting week. Anybody who's project or area is deemed strategic in there is probably going to be getting more this week.
Well aware. It's why I'm in for an interesting week. Anybody who's project or area is deemed strategic in there is probably going to be getting more this week.
I like the ambition. Question whether it is achievable. There are concrete obstacles that we discussed at work (like security clearances and accreditation) that made it in. Somebody is listening. But they are deliberately vague on how they will define things. And the document seems out of place without an accompanying new strategy. Which after Davos, is clearly necessary.
A list of goals without a plan is not really a strategy. It's a wishlist. This is closer to wishlist than strategy.
But I'm guessing they are being vague because they still want room to deal with the Trump administration. We might be trading F-35s for CUSMA renewal.
I like the ambition. Question whether it is achievable. There are concrete obstacles that we discussed at work (like security clearances and accreditation) that made it in. Somebody is listening. But they are deliberately vague on how they will define things. And the document seems out of place without an accompanying new strategy. Which after Davos, is clearly necessary.
A list of goals without a plan is not really a strategy. It's a wishlist. This is closer to wishlist than strategy.
But I'm guessing they are being vague because they still want room to deal with the Trump administration. We might be trading F-35s for CUSMA renewal.
I agree with your thoughts on F35 (most likely more than 88 frames) for CUSMA. The price might even be, that, plus buy in now in the F-47 programme as well.
I agree with your thoughts on F35 (most likely more than 88 frames) for CUSMA. The price might even be, that, plus buy in now in the F-47 programme as well.
Lol. No. I don't think we're buying more than the 88. Or at least not much more. And we just definitely aren't joining NGAD. It's not a program open to foreigners. And the government doesn't want to create another defence obligation with the US. Who knows. They may well have made a decision on the Gripen and this could be the soft launch. Pretty clear where the space projects are going for me.
Lol. No. I don't think we're buying more than the 88. Or at least not much more. And we just definitely aren't joining NGAD. It's not a program open to foreigners. And the government doesn't want to create another defence obligation with the US. Who knows. They may well have made a decision on the Gripen and this could be the soft launch. Pretty clear where the space projects are going for me.
I was thinking of the cost angle as to why NGAD might be open to us (and others) down the road. I don’t see a path forward for the US in terms of costs for just about everything. At 38+ trillion in debt and growing each and every year, a day of reckoning will come sooner or later.
I think ‘avionics’ was number 2 or 3 on the list, was wondering if that is linked to Gripen’s or something else.
Funny that ‘ammunition’, unclear if we are going to corner the market on 5.56 going forward or if that means 155mm, was deemed #1 priority.
Seems like we might be flushed going forward with 155 for our remaining 36 arty pieces.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.