- Reaction score
- 6,672
- Points
- 1,260
The document has been available here for a number of days already.Defence Industrial Strategy is leaking. Going to be a fun week for me at work...

The document has been available here for a number of days already.Defence Industrial Strategy is leaking. Going to be a fun week for me at work...
The document has been available here for a number of days already.
70% Canadian procurement is a high bar. I have a feeling the navy will be doing a lot of heavy lifting for that.
What are your thoughts on the content of the approach?Well aware. It's why I'm in for an interesting week. Anybody who's project or area is deemed strategic in there is probably going to be getting more this week.
I agree with your thoughts on F35 (most likely more than 88 frames) for CUSMA. The price might even be, that, plus buy in now in the F-47 programme as well.I like the ambition. Question whether it is achievable. There are concrete obstacles that we discussed at work (like security clearances and accreditation) that made it in. Somebody is listening. But they are deliberately vague on how they will define things. And the document seems out of place without an accompanying new strategy. Which after Davos, is clearly necessary.
A list of goals without a plan is not really a strategy. It's a wishlist. This is closer to wishlist than strategy.
But I'm guessing they are being vague because they still want room to deal with the Trump administration. We might be trading F-35s for CUSMA renewal.
I agree with your thoughts on F35 (most likely more than 88 frames) for CUSMA. The price might even be, that, plus buy in now in the F-47 programme as well.
I was thinking of the cost angle as to why NGAD might be open to us (and others) down the road. I don’t see a path forward for the US in terms of costs for just about everything. At 38+ trillion in debt and growing each and every year, a day of reckoning will come sooner or later.Lol. No. I don't think we're buying more than the 88. Or at least not much more. And we just definitely aren't joining NGAD. It's not a program open to foreigners. And the government doesn't want to create another defence obligation with the US. Who knows. They may well have made a decision on the Gripen and this could be the soft launch. Pretty clear where the space projects are going for me.
Man I hope BAE can be convinced to open a factory here...shoot CV90 straight into my crewman veins lolGDLS, GDOTS, Colt Canada, BGC, Irving, Seaspan, CAE, CMC, MDA me, Telesat and LockMart Canada about to win big.
Best we can do is a Bombardier Ski-Doo with a pintle mount.Man I hope BAE can be convinced to open a factory here...shoot CV90 straight into my crewman veins lol
Womp wompBest we can do is a Bombardier Ski-Doo with a pintle mount.
You might get CV90. As your tank.....Man I hope BAE can be convinced to open a factory here...shoot CV90 straight into my crewman veins lol
Bite your tongue palYou might get CV90. As your tank.....
"To build up Canadian defence champions, the Government will publish a framework for the identification and onboarding of select Canadian defence firms as key strategic partners, by no later than summer 2026"
Bite your tongue pal
At least my death will be quick.
Bite your tongue pal
At least my death will be quick.
Tracked stryker motive gear, ACSV hull, MGS turret.
Sounds like Minto needs another fire...Tracked stryker motive gear, ACSV hull, MGS turret.
You're welcome.
I might see if I can 3d print files for them and digitally kitbash it, you can put it in your mess.