I like the ambition. Question whether it is achievable. There are concrete obstacles that we discussed at work (like security clearances and accreditation) that made it in. Somebody is listening. But they are deliberately vague on how they will define things. And the document seems out of place without an accompanying new strategy. Which after Davos, is clearly necessary.
A list of goals without a plan is not really a strategy. It's a wishlist. This is closer to wishlist than strategy.
But I'm guessing they are being vague because they still want room to deal with the Trump administration. We might be trading F-35s for CUSMA renewal.