- Reaction score
- 41,180
- Points
- 1,210
That's more the brown pants.Or the brown shoes mask the fact that you poo'd yourself.

That's more the brown pants.Or the brown shoes mask the fact that you poo'd yourself.
That photo has been circulating for at least two years now.New photo dropped and reportly it was confirmed at cansec that roll out begins this fall
View attachment 100541
Well then edited and removed since its an old photoThat photo has been circulating for at least two years now.
Well heres to hoping.reportly it was confirmed at cansec that roll out begins this fall
Nope! whoever said that was incorrect. Design refinement after this winter's fit trial begins now and goes through the fall, right into the maternity cut design at the end of the year.reportly it was confirmed at cansec that roll out begins this fall
Ironic as I remember the musings 2 years ago the plan was to have the Strats pimped out for their parade last year.Keep in mind that for the CAF, Q3 of FY 2027 is October - December 2027. So we are about 17 months out from seeing this uniform on parade.
The deal was altered. Let's pray they don't alter it further.Ironic as I remember the musings 2 years ago the plan was to have the Strats pimped out for their parade last year.
Cant come soon enough. Looks fantastic.Sharp looking uniform.
Brown oxfords? it will be interesting to see when those are requiredLatest and greatest.
As I understand, officers will wear brown oxfords, and other ranks continue with black footwear.Brown oxfords? it will be interesting to see when those are required
Any idea if there is a plan to reduce the number of badges or sub unit identifiers on the uniform? Are they planning to retain the divisional badges, brigade identifiers, name tags, operational command badge, etc? I think less is more.Latest and greatest.
Or you know Troops wearing combats at Remembrance Day parades which is specifically prohibited in the dress regs.Any idea if there is a plan to reduce the number of badges or sub unit identifiers on the uniform? Are they planning to retain the divisional badges, brigade identifiers, name tags, operational command badge, etc? I think less is more.
The uniform looks sharp. Could be disappointing to have it emblazed with a plethora of decoration that might take your eye off the clean look of the uniform itself. So sharp that I could imagine some 5 button special operations folks eyeing it.
One request: A crew neck khaki/olive sweater reminiscent of the older green “combat sweater”. I know – lots of kit. But in a future where I’d hope CF members aren’t wearing combats in an office environment every day, maybe bringing back the sweater would bridge the strict formalism of the complete service dress with a nod to practical climate and environment. Would look sharper than fleece.
One nitpick: Maybe colour the tie a slightly lighter shade from that of the tunic and slacks.
Any idea if there is a plan to reduce the number of badges or sub unit identifiers on the uniform? Are they planning to retain the divisional badges, brigade identifiers, name tags, operational command badge, etc? I think less is more.
One request: A crew neck khaki/olive sweater reminiscent of the older green “combat sweater”. I know – lots of kit. But in a future where I’d hope CF members aren’t wearing combats in an office environment every day, maybe bringing back the sweater would bridge the strict formalism of the complete service dress with a nod to practical climate and environment. Would look sharper than fleece.
Or you know Troops wearing combats at Remembrance Day parades which is specifically prohibited in the dress regs.
Where is that written in the Canadian Forces Dress Instructions?Or you know Troops wearing combats at Remembrance Day parades which is specifically prohibited in the dress regs.
The new service dress will also have the sweater, in the new colours, and with a crew neck instead of the shallow V of the current sweater.