HavokFour
Army.ca Veteran
- Reaction score
- 3,785
- Points
- 1,040
Aka…subs are hard.
Wouldn't want them squishy.

Aka…subs are hard.
Norway’s boat deal is Government to Government, so likely very late in the game to tilt the needle.Yep probably number two or three. Then after that it doesn't really matter.
They didn't magically do it as I stated before. Norway in particular stepped in a committed one of their own boats to sweeten the pot. TKMS bid that went in at the same time as Korean one stated 2033 as the first Canadian boat. Norway's commitment came when? I don't know.
I’m sure you won’t need 12 names at the end of the day.If TKMS has a history of taking their submarine contractors for a ride that would be pretty clear. Their reputation is quite the opposite with decades of integration and experience. So I'm going glass is half full on this. Yes they had first of class problems (Type 214... ) for sure. I expect there will be some for this boat as well.
Agreed on both points. Fish do not vote (neither do rivers though... lol)
12 subs = 10 provinces 2 territories.
Yukon gets cut. That's a river so it will be part of the River Class!
6 names - 6 of them with "II" after their names...replacing the "First of Its Name" when it gets paid off as the twin is launched...my middle initial is "C" for "Cynic"I’m sure you won’t need 12 names at the end of the day.
No.I thought Babcock did all the EDWP Sub maintenance? They just happen to be at VSL (Seaspan). I never saw Seaspan people on the East Coast, just Babcock. Mind you, FMF still does a lot of it too.
We can revisit this in (takes off shoes to count) more than ten years. It will be 8 years till we get four.Norway’s boat deal is Government to Government, so likely very late in the game to tilt the needle.
I’m sure you won’t need 12 names at the end of the day.
That alone will probably make a bunch if people happy. Lot of maint types are NOT impressed with Babcock. Of course maint types are never happy. Even me... I can be a real asshole.No.
Babcock does the EDWP now.
VSL will be TKMS partner for the 212s
True.We can revisit this in (takes off shoes to count) more than ten years. It will be 8 years till we get four.
So you're saying John A MacDonald, Edgar Ryerson or Sir Sam Steele are out?The use of historical figures was highly discouraged by some committee members as your just inviting issues.
If they decide to name them after provinces, maybe keep Alberta and Quebec to the end of production.I’m sure you won’t need 12 names at the end of the day.
His Majesty’s Canadian Untersee Boot 1867
Number them after auspicious events in RCN history- even though I started with 1867His Majesty’s Canadian Untersee Boot 1867
There are winners and losers whenever you have to pick namesakes for ships, it might not be the goal to "prefer" one nation/group over another but you are fundamentally doing so when some make the grade and others are left on the cutting room floor.
Now the fight would be worth watchingThere are 634 Indigenous groups in Canada. You could ask for them all to submit their approval to name the subs after them.
Would it not mean if the hull number gets reduced, then so too do the ITB’s, offset etc commensurately?We can revisit this in (takes off shoes to count) more than ten years. It will be 8 years till we get four.
