• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

Liberal (Minority/Majority) Government 2025 - ???

@Altair

Not to upset you but PM MC has hired an American, Maia Johnson as his newly created PMO position, Chief Operations Officer. I think Carney, while not thrilled with Trump, still trust Americans. ohh, and he has a house down there. Plus lots of investments. Just saying.
 
@Altair

Not to upset you but PM MC has hired an American, Maia Johnson as his newly created PMO position, Chief Operations Officer. I think Carney, while not thrilled with Trump, still trust Americans. ohh, and he has a house down there. Plus lots of investments. Just saying.
So he’s keeping an open objective mind, and dealing with people based on the history and record of their actions. Not an unreasonable approach.
 
@Altair

Not to upset you but PM MC has hired an American, Maia Johnson as his newly created PMO position, Chief Operations Officer. I think Carney, while not thrilled with Trump, still trust Americans. ohh, and he has a house down there. Plus lots of investments. Just saying.
why would that be upsetting? Just because Canada is having difficulties with the trump administration doesn't mean everything american is tainted.
 
1000-1500 Canadians may have said this? Accepting your math, no, lets double it, lets say it was 3000 Canadians. Yeah, I hardly accept that as representing the 41 million Canadians as a whole.
Next poll of 2000 Canadians showing the CPC ahead of the LPC I'll make sure to dismiss out of hand.
In my OPINION, accepting the views of maybe 3,000 Canadians as representing 41 million Canadians is foolish at best.
Yeah, cool, I'll wait around tomorrow for the next poll of 41 million Canadians.

Every poll less than that is clearly too small a sample size.

What a joke.
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20260716_002949_Samsung Browser.jpg
    Screenshot_20260716_002949_Samsung Browser.jpg
    181.9 KB · Views: 12
42,000 people in 36 countries mean around 1,200 respondents per country. For a Canadian poll to be statistically relevant, 1,000 to 1,500 people would need to respond. Assuming 1,200 Canadians responded, it is statistically relevant, whether you like it or not….
In that case, why mention the other 41,000 people at all? Why not just present it as a poll of 1,200 Canadians?
 
1000-1500 Canadians may have said this? Accepting your math, no, lets double it, lets say it was 3000 Canadians. Yeah, I hardly accept that as representing the 41 million Canadians as a whole.
Science says it is statistically relevant.

Agreed. We all have biases or at the very least, emotions that can influence how we perceive polls.
Being mature is having emotions and biaises and being able to look past them to make decisions based on objective observation.
 
Actually determining statistically significant sample sizes isnt that hard and isnt new. Most research in the real world is limited by money and time
 
Interesting to see this large of an increase in the GTA.


Gun licence applications have surged in the Toronto area since 2016​

Reason for the increase isn't clear, growing interest in shooting sports likely contributing​


Taking some form of responsibility for ones own sustainability and safety should surprise no one but most collectivist and leftist amongst us.

IMHO our country and society is a weak house of cards, having some ability for both the aforementioned issues just makes sense, again IMHO.

Better to have the tool and not need it, than need it and not have it.
 
Taking some form of responsibility for ones own sustainability and safety should surprise no one but most collectivist and leftist amongst us.

IMHO our country and society is a weak house of cards, having some ability for both the aforementioned issues just makes sense, again IMHO.

Better to have the tool and not need it, than need it and not have it.
Your making the assumption that the increase of numbers in the GTA is solely occurring with those who identify as 'right wing', since you use the term 'leftist'. I would argue, based on the information/data presented in the article, that its a wide variety of beliefs spanning the political spectrum. The article also points out that the increase is linked to more individuals doing it for 'sport' reasons, not because of an increase in the hunting side of things.

I've wanted to get my PAL for about 5yrs now but never seem to have a free weekend from friday to sunday to make it happen. Maybe later this fall it will work out for me.

If anyone has a instructor/course in the Burlington, ON area that they would recommend, I would appreciate that information.
 
Your making the assumption that the increase of numbers in the GTA is solely occurring with those who identify as 'right wing', since you use the term 'leftist'. I would argue, based on the information/data presented in the article, that its a wide variety of beliefs spanning the political spectrum. The article also points out that the increase is linked to more individuals doing it for 'sport' reasons, not because of an increase in the hunting side of things.

I've wanted to get my PAL for about 5yrs now but never seem to have a free weekend from friday to sunday to make it happen. Maybe later this fall it will work out for me.

If anyone has a instructor/course in the Burlington, ON area that they would recommend, I would appreciate that information.

Not at all. I am amongst the minority in my family and friends circle, as a conservative owning firearms. Where we differ is I have owned not just traditional hunting rifles. In my experience its only the most most collectivist and leftist amongst us who are against this.
 
Not at all. I am amongst the minority in my family and friends circle, as a conservative owning firearms. Where we differ is I have owned not just traditional hunting rifles. In my experience its only the most most collectivist and leftist amongst us who are against this.
What is the meaning of 'Collectivist' in your usage?
 
Next poll of 2000 Canadians showing the CPC ahead of the LPC I'll make sure to dismiss out of hand.
I wouldn't trust it either. If its one poll, its either an outlier or a lucky week. I would trust 6 weeks of several polls saying CPC beating LPC, more reliable.
Every poll less than that is clearly too small a sample size.
Read again, what I posted more than once. Single polls, one time polling, etc. can be accurate or an outlier or poorly done.

Several polls over larger groups, especially done over periods of time are more clearer.
 
That's not the sentiment around here.
The partisan nonsense crap that goes on around here with many folks is if the conservatives say or do something with Americans involved, they fein outrage and "elbows up" but Carney or his team does is and its "pragmatic"and "diplomatic".

They spin themselves into a fairy tale and clutch onto fantasies hoping for something to be true.

I at least admit my bias and my partisanship. I also have criticized my own party (Many here have missed that over and over again) because they are too busy interpreting reality to be something they want it to be rather than what it is.

I will infuriate and piss off some here, don't care.
 
I wouldn't trust it either. If its one poll, its either an outlier or a lucky week. I would trust 6 weeks of several polls saying CPC beating LPC, more reliable.

Read again, what I posted more than once. Single polls, one time polling, etc. can be accurate or an outlier or poorly done.

Several polls over larger groups, especially done over periods of time are more clearer.
Periods of time....good grief.

I would explain to you the folly of this but I doubt you want to learn so I'll leave you to your ignorance.
 
Back
Top