• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

TKMS Type 212CD (Victoria class replacement megathread)

I 100% agree with your words. I hope Germany does not screw us over.
The government is afraid quite frankly . The choice of the South Korean SSK would have led to many hard decisions in both the foreign and defence.
The Government is used to dealing with Europe it's feels like it is in it's comfort zone. We've spent most of this country's history it seems trying to avoid the Pacific. Aside from some tentative steps.
So I think we took the easy way out I just hope that doesn't bite us in the ass in a few years.
Is it just me by the way or does it now seem that we're virtually ignoring the South Koreans?
That also bothers me on several levels.
 
The government is afraid quite frankly . The choice of the South Korean SSK would have led to many hard decisions in both the foreign and defence.
The Government is used to dealing with Europe it's feels like it is in it's comfort zone. We've spent most of this country's history it seems trying to avoid the Pacific. Aside from some tentative steps.
So I think we took the easy way out I just hope that doesn't bite us in the ass in a few years.
Is it just me by the way or does it now seem that we're virtually ignoring the South Koreans?
That also bothers me on several levels.

Their new tanks and SP guns are pretty cool...
 
On a (somewhat distant but) related note to this topic of Arctic operation of submarines, I note in a recent CNR Broadsides: the following:

Xue Long (Snow Dragon) and Xue Long (Snow Dragon) 2 sailed north through the US exclusive economic zone in the Bering Sea in July. .... China says the ships are in the region is strictly for peaceful scientific research, environmental monitoring and global climate change studies. There is suspicion, however, that the ships are deploying advanced sonar and telemetry buoys which can track environmental changes and undersea topography, but also submarine activity.

where that article references a CBC Article: Canada, U.S. shadow Chinese research ships in the Arctic as concern grows over Snow Dragons' presence

Both Canada and the U.S. have been quietly shadowing two Chinese icebreaking research ships in Arctic waters off Alaska over the last couple of weeks.

The Xue Long (Snow Dragon) and Xue Long (Snow Dragon) 2 sailed north through the U.S. exclusive economic zone in the Bering Sea in July, according to the U.S. Coast Guard.
...
Buoys can track submarine activity

When asked about the Chinese ships on Thursday, Defence Minister David McGuinty said the Canadian military actively monitors the country's waters.
...
Both research ships, however, have been known to deploy advanced sonar and telemetry buoys. Western defence officials say these devices not only track environmental changes and undersea topography, but are also useful in tracking submarine activity.
...
The federal government has begun investing heavily in the construction of new destroyers and begun the process of acquiring Arctic-capable submarines. It also plans to deploy an undersea network of sensors.
...
However if one reads the CBC article that is claimed to be about "Arctic-capable submarines", it only refers to the submarines being located at "western approaches to Canada's Arctic coast and archipelago".

So that is a bit of a stretch (unless there is more known not stated) to state "Arctic capable submarines". Just because a submarine has an AIP system, in itself, does not make a submarine 'arctic-capable' in my view.
 
Their new tanks and SP guns are pretty cool...
And I hope that before we buy new tanks/SP guns/MCAV we actually go out in the field and test them rather than relying on the manufacturers propaganda. Or because someone in Ottawa wrote the RFIs to favour a specific manufacturer.
 
Back
Top