Her actions were to change the laws to make it easier for the separatists to get a referendum, while talking out of both sides of her mouth, basically saying “Hey, let’s see what happens”. Not exactly the actions of a federalist government.
I don't mind her loosening up the requirements if it means the average working class person has more of a say in where their province/community is going. No problem at all.
...
People criticize Danielle Smith a lot for treating the province like the democracy that it is.
She proposed the Alberta Pension Plan, held a series of townhalls (I attended 2 for professional reasons) and hosted a few weeks of 'open mic' call-in sessions on the radio where people from across the province could call in & speak with her directly to express their views and why they had them - all on live radio.
It turned out the public wasn't overly fond of the idea, so she shelved it. Hasn't been brought up since.
Isn't that exactly how democracy is supposed to work?
Aren't the people supposed to have a say in what direction their elected governments go in?
Aren't the people supposed to be able to provide feedback & direction on big issues that directly affect them?
Proposing an idea to the general public & soliciting their feedback - and allowing that feedback to be as transparent as live call-in sessions on public radio waves is exactly what I want from my government, personally.
...
The federal government has made it clear they are willing and wanting to do things at the federal level whether the citizens support the idea or not.
They've made it extremely clear they don't give a single flying f**k what the citizenry want, and have asked for people's opinions/ideas precisely 0 times.
Did ANYBODY ask the general public how they feel about lending China a billion dollars?
Did anybody ask us if we wanted online censorship laws?
Did anybody ask us if we wanted to do away with our previous bail policy, or mandatory sentences for certain crimes/offenders?
Did anybody ask us how we felt about mass basically unvetted immigration?
No. Nobody in the federal government did.
Nor will they.
Why? Because they don't f**king care about your opinion. They couldn't give less of a shit about what you think actually.
(If they had any interest in what the public thinks about certain issues, they would ask for that feedback & be transparent about what that feedback says. But they haven't...
They will push ahead with their list of absolutely horrible ideas & will impose those ideas on you and I alike whether we agree with them or not.
And every few years they'll tell us what a great job they've done and how much better things are for Canadians because of them, and ask us to donate to their party and vote for them all over again.
The point of my rant here is this...
If I look at how the spirit of democracy is being exercised by the Alberta government, and how the spirit of democracy is being exercised by the federal government - between the two, I much prefer Alberta's way.
Even if some of the ideas put forward seem silly.
(RangerRay, just to be clear I am agreeing with your post! I was also just using it as a launching pad for my little rant above - any criticisms or harshness is NOT directed at you at all)
