
Not really, because it forces the current UCP government ti get off the fence and pick a side. If forever canada passes then they need to stop pandering to seperatists.Also, the Forever Canada is a moot vote. Either result in that vote triggers nothing. And its purpose was to nullify the separatists path, to set them back years or stymie their intentions.
The whole point of this referendum is that if it goes one way, a series of future actions are then triggered. Forever Canada is designed to cease or delay that regardless of vote outcome.
Not really, because it forces the current UCP government ti get off the fence and pick a side. If forever canada passes then they need to stop pandering to seperatists.
Except that this pretends the Forever Canadian petition doesn’t exist. They succeeded; they crossed the threshold and the matter has been legally referred to the legislature. Smith is slow-rolling it with referral to a nearly dormant committee… But eventually they will be forced to either place it on the referendum ballot, or to force the legislature to vote on the matter and show their true colours.Really.
My estimate: The UCP are going to sit this one out until after the referendum (on leaving), for now they will fence sit like they've been doing.
If the 'leave' votes wins you will see the UCP pivot to be the Parti Albertois and will aggressively advance the next phases to follow.
If the "leave" vote loses, status quo, the issue loses some steam and goes away for a little while. The UCP will not risk becoming openly separatist without a clear referendum win on 'Leave' for fear of splitting the party, and risk the NDP to run up the middle again next election.
This is why you will see a referendum on leaving not on staying - follow on options remain open.
Except that this pretends the Forever Canadian petition doesn’t exist. They succeeded; they crossed the threshold and the matter has been legally referred to the legislature. Smith is slow-rolling it with referral to a nearly dormant committee… But eventually they will be forced to either place it on the referendum ballot, or to force the legislature to vote on the matter and show their true colours.
Alberta voters should be profoundly disappointed in a provincial government unwilling to unequivocally say where they stand on a matter as fundamental as secession from Canada. It’s cowardly.
Oh this just got worse for the UCP
Alberta NDP claims 2 UCP members attended virtual Centurion Project meeting, party president and caucus director attended training session.
![]()
Alberta NDP claims 2 UCP members attended virtual Centurion Project meeting
Alberta’s New Democrats say they have obtained evidence of two United Conservative Party members attending an online Centurion Project meeting on April 16.www.ctvnews.ca
It was a formal and legal citizens’ initiative under the old version of the statute. It literally does compel next steps. That’s how that law works.Its politics.
The UCP can ignore Forever Canada, citizen petitions do not compel anything. Cabinet can decline to proceed. It is certainly politically risky.
More likely both questions are on the ballot.
Whoops. We may need to merge this into the FAFO thread.Jason Kenny consulting legal advice after his data used publicly for training
Separatists from Temu would be a great name for a Franco Albertan ska punk band.I spent a lot of time trying to make my opinion known that these separatists from temu are a joke, and it's a little sad that they are doing they are doing it for me these days.
We should talk it into existance.Separatists from Temu would be a great name for a Franco Albertan ska punk band.
Plus there needs to be a Quebec provincial political party called The Friends of Rocky Leja.We should talk it into existance.