
Balance of power struggle between provincial legislature and the court. Legislature doesn’t like the court constraining what manner of Citizens’ Initiative petition they can authorize.Oh but of course Smith announces her government is appealing!
Balance of power struggle between provincial legislature and the court. Legislature doesn’t like the court constraining what manner of Citizens’ Initiative petition they can authorize.
Seems to be she disagrees with the duty to consult ruling.Balance of power struggle between provincial legislature and the court. Legislature doesn’t like the court constraining what manner of Citizens’ Initiative petition they can authorize.
If that's her best response, then this is done and dusted.Seems to be she disagrees with the duty to consult ruling.
Shes being forced to pick a side, forever canada is going to put her to the fire now. Why? Because forever canada when submitted chicked off the box legislative or policy proposal. Not referendum, which means, and this was confirmed in committee yesterday. That this will go to a vote in the legislature as a binding vote. Smith doesnt want that because it will likely reveal the true colours of the UCPIf that's her best response, then this is done and dusted.
Not that I'm surprised coming from the Premier that thought she could grant pardons.
Although I love the call out to Quebec, please help!
I dont think the CAQ want to touch this before the provincial election in the fall.
Funny, she's swearing up and down that it's the opposite.Shes being forced to pick a side, forever canada is going to put her to the fire now. Why? Because forever canada when submitted chicked off the box legislative or policy proposal. Not referendum, which means, and this was confirmed in committee yesterday. That this will go to a vote in the legislature as a binding vote. Smith doesnt want that because it will likely reveal the true colours of the UCP
Funny, she's swearing up and down that it's the opposite.
And yet the little check box says she's wrongFunny, she's swearing up and down that it's the opposite.
We have now 700,000 Albertans whether they’re on the remain side or the leave side who’ve said that they want to have this public debate.
She is, and running out of optionsTell me she’s not a separatist.
![]()
Danielle Smith rejects Alberta judge’s ruling against separation petition as ‘anti-democratic’ | Globalnews.ca
Premier Danielle Smith is rejecting the ruling of an Alberta judge who quashed a separatist petition and says the province will appeal the court ruling.globalnews.ca
Tell me she’s not a separatist.
I love it when the Quebec Liberal Party or the Coalition Avenir Quebec decide to listen to all their constituents and decide, ya, lets pull out all the stops and hold referendums for them...Just to play the devil’s avocado here, I've read elected officials are supposed to represent all of their constituents, not just the people who fully agree with them politically. (e.g MPs crossing the floor).
Could Smith just be ensuring all her constituents have a voice?
Brooks-medhat is a very strong separation heart land, its a riding that is very anti-gov, anti vax, etc, its why she chose to run there. However separatism is still a minority not a majority voice there. So what about the rest of the population? Smith gov has shown time and again she doesn't respect the will of the majorty, example Alberta police force, Alberta pension plan, recent polling also suggest only 21% agree with the referendum topics happening on oct 21stJust to play the devil’s avocado here, I've read elected officials are supposed to represent all of their constituents, not just the people who fully agree with them politically. (e.g MPs crossing the floor).
Could Smith just be ensuring all her constituents have a voice?