
Sir, this is a wendys.Martha Hall Findley (Former Liberal MP and one of the architects of carbon capture) has some interesting stuff to say about the outdated and now illogical carbon capture project
Mods, would this be better in the pipelines thread?Martha Hall Findley (Former Liberal MP and one of the architects of carbon capture) has some interesting stuff to say about the outdated and now illogical carbon capture project
I'm sure things will progress swimmingly, until Brookfield receives its multi millions, if not billions, of dollars for the carbon capture infrastructure and initiative in Alberta.
My opinion and its just thatWhat are you suggesting? The federal government will approve a provincial/private consortium to build a pipeline… and then I guess years later after some separate carbon capture project is complete, suddenly they’ll order a halt to construction or operations? Not sure what fiendish plot you’re suggesting here.
Given that Brookfield is a majority owner of one of the major pipeline networks from the oil sands, as well major involvement in natural gas and distillate distribution, I guess we need to accept an unlimited potential for goalpost shifting, however this all plays out. I’ll laugh my ass off if Brookfield Infrastructure Partners or another Brookfield subsidiary ends up in partnership with Alberta on this.
Ok, but I’m not here debating carbon capture. I was just asking what he was talking about.My opinion and its just that
The carbon capture and storage is the ultimate two sided fail safe for PM MC. It allows Mark to look like he is reaching out a helping hand to the oil and gas industry while setting himself up to stay strong with the anti-energy/green crowd, especially in Ontario and Quebec.
Its very difficult, highly expensive and somewhat dangerous to do with todays technology. Its not likely to attract private industry investment as their is little to no way to make any money off of it. It basically becomes a massive expense for nothing but to make people feel better. It really deters private interest. And it really doesn't do anything for ecological health. If a child who cleans his room by hiding everything under the bed, hasn't actually cleaned his room at all. Just moved it out of sight.
What the hell do you think storing Carbon underground does? And it has had dangerous consequences as in the USA a few years ago when it leaked and killed livestock.
Their is a natural way to store carbon, Trees, grassy meadows and other plant life, suck up carbon and store it safely (and in useful form to boot)
Former Liberal MP Martha Hall Findlay help establish Carbon Capture in the pathways project and she has said its an out of date concept and we need to halt it now for the good of the economy.
David Parker suggests he has skipped town to Texas. Sure sounds like he is running from the investigation......
Danielle smith may go down in history as a separatist so ineffective she saved confederation forever.More on the separatist court cases. It looks effectively dead.
![]()
Clarke Ries: How two Alberta judges shot separatist delusions to death
(And, not for nothing, they probably just wrecked Quebec separatism, too.)www.readtheline.ca
That's certainly one way to separate from canada.David Parker suggests he has skipped town to Texas. Sure sounds like he is running from the investigation......
Yeah but my question is, since he refused to comply with elections albertas. Did he take a copy of the voters list with him?That's certainly one way to separate from canada.
It's digital. Why would he have to take a copy physically with him?Yeah but my question is, since he refused to comply with elections albertas. Did he take a copy of the voters list with him?
Said digital list was court ordered taken downIt's digital. Why would he have to take a copy physically with him?
I'm sure there were no copies made...Said digital list was court ordered taken down
www.thebeaverton.com
In addition, they would have to pass a new law explicitly invoking Sec. 33, and since the SCOC has ruled that Sec. 33 cannot be used retroactively, it seems they would have to pass a new law to empower a new petition.So in QP yesterday Smith suggested she might use the NWC to try and get the sep referendum to a vote. Problem is the NWC doesnt apply to s35 of the constitution. Who the heck is giving her legal advice?
Smith and the Separatists are absolutely cooked.In addition, they would have to pass a new law explicitly invoking Sec. 33, and since the SCOC has ruled that Sec. 33 cannot be used retroactively, it seems they would have to pass a new law to empower a new petition.
I'm sure it's all explained in the separatists brochure, somewhere.
Some people think Sec. 33 is a get out of jail free card.