
Yeah before Covid, the rail blockades were starting to cripple this country. It would be best if we as a country/society/government got ahead of this and in my mind bit the bulletSpeaking to my friend still working the regulatory field, this is rippling into the regulatory world by impacting consulting, coupled with UNDRIP The combined impact may have a rippling effect for years to come and impact on Canada's GDP.
Top-down federalism right there - and not just with this set of issues. Well summed up.Problem is that Ottawadoes not understand consultation andwants a one size fit all process, but each province is different and each band needs a different approach ...
If only someone could have warned the government ....... coupled with UNDRIP ...
Tricky, given that, constitutionally, indigenous affairs are strictly federal. It makes the overlap with provincial heads of power (eg, natural resources) trickier. Top-down federalism on indigenous issues would be hard to slide out from under in the best of circumstances.Top-down federalism right there - and not just with this set of issues. Well summed up.
If only someone could have warned the government ....
Especially adding in the state-to-state nature of at least some of the treaties and other relationships.Tricky, given that, constitutionally, indigenous affairs are strictly federal. It makes the overlap with provincial heads of power (eg, natural resources) trickier. Top-down federalism on indigenous issues would be hard to slide out from under in the best of circumstances.
Speaking to my friend still working the regulatory field, this is rippling into the regulatory world by impacting consulting, coupled with UNDRIP The combined impact may have a rippling effect for years to come and impact on Canada's GDP.
There is no relationship more important to the Government of Canada than the one with Indigenous Peoples.
Constitutionally speaking, that's true, but if Indigenous reserve members are also considered citizens of each province*, there's a certain level of responsibility there to serve provincial citizens, too. There's approximately a range of responses from "happy to offer help & support with the local government's consent" all the way to "reserve land = fed land = zero provincial responsibility - talk to Ottawa", with various positions in between.Tricky, given that, constitutionally, indigenous affairs are strictly federal. It makes the overlap with provincial heads of power (eg, natural resources) trickier. Top-down federalism on indigenous issues would be hard to slide out from under in the best of circumstances.
It would be super interesting if he were to throw his name in the hat for leader of the BC Liberals….
This guy brings up a good perspective and a good argument. That's the sort of thing and ideas that should be capitalised on.
I’ve never heard of him until now. Is he someone that’s well known there?It would be super interesting if he were to throw his name in the hat for leader of the BC Liberals….
He has been slowly building a name for himself. I think he is actually the real deal and if took the leadership of the BC Liberals, he could conceivably run the table on both the NDP and the Greens.I’ve never heard of him until now. Is he someone that’s well known there?
A voice of reason and sense. He'll be railroaded by the others who feel he's a threat. Sorry about the dim view but I have zero faith in our system where good people are "witch hunted" and burnt at the stake (figuratively) to satisfy the ego of the fair haired boy.
This guy brings up a good perspective and a good argument. That's the sort of thing and ideas that should be capitalised on.
I think the appetite for common sense & reason is hungry enough that views like his will resonate with most.A voice of reason and sense. He'll be railroaded by the others who feel he's a threat. Sorry about the dim view but I have zero faith in our system where good people are "witch hunted" and burnt at the stake (figuratively) to satisfy the ego of the fair haired boy.
I’ve never heard of him until now. Is he someone that’s well known there?
So, if one was to replace “Church” with ”Mosque” in that article, how well would that play? How okay have people been with churches being burnt down in the southern US?Didn't take The Beaverton very long: "Catholic church asked to keep in mind the good arson has done"