If media sound bites are anything to go by, they sure think a lot about the interests and welfare of the very small indigenous minority of the province. As for the rest of the population, I have no idea.
If media sound bites are anything to go by, they sure think a lot about the interests and welfare of the very small indigenous minority of the province. As for the rest of the population, I have no idea.
Is BC really a Representative Parliamentary Democracy if every decision of the Legislature can be over turned because a First Nation Elder somewhere objects?
Is BC really a Representative Parliamentary Democracy if every decision of the Legislature can be over turned because a First Nation Elder somewhere objects?
I am not sure what to make of the predicament the people who climbed on the UNDRIP bandwagon have placed us in. UNDRIP is a declaration, not a treaty, and the enabling legislation (federal and provincial) is entirely self-inflicted.
Everyone in the province who is non-indigenous also owns, occupies, and uses lands. There is only one side of the two that is overwhelmingly responsible for all the improvements that make first-world living possible. There are not many people I know who do not quietly observe that it is a strange thing that the people who are responsible for almost all of the improvements should pay rents in order to be able to make the improvements.
Is BC really a Representative Parliamentary Democracy if every decision of the Legislature can be over turned because a First Nation Elder somewhere objects?
If media sound bites are anything to go by, they sure think a lot about the interests and welfare of the very small indigenous minority of the province. As for the rest of the population, I have no idea.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.