• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

CAN-led MN Bde (formerly eFP BG) Latvia Megathread

Crystal Arrow is an annual Latvian mechanized brigade exercise. Up until the establishment of the MN Bde it served as the creval but not anymore. eFP troops may be on it but usually in a supporting / enemy force role.

Totally pumping the clutch and grinding gears...

I saw a reel about a multi national RFC in Riga... You part of that ?
 
Upgrades underway in Latvia to support both our current deployed forces as well as facilitating reinforcement if necessary...


Canada broke ground on two major military construction projects in Latvia on May 19, laying foundation stones for a rotary-wing helicopter facility at Lielvārde Air Base and accommodation buildings at both Lielvārde and Riga in a combined investment of €64 million, or approximately $70 million.
The larger of the two new projects, valued at €33 million ($36 million), will build a dedicated rotary-wing apron and flight line at Lielvārde, a military airbase located roughly 60 kilometers southeast of Riga. The facility will include hangar space, maintenance infrastructure, and flight line office facilities designed to support Canada’s Tactical Air Detachment in Latvia.

The operational footprint is specific: the new apron will accommodate up to six CH-146 Griffon utility helicopters and four CH-147 Chinook heavy-lift helicopters simultaneously, while also providing ground support for loading and unloading of larger aircraft including the CC-177 Globemaster, Canada’s strategic transport jet. That combination of rotary and fixed-wing support infrastructure gives the Canadian force a meaningful increase in its ability to move troops, equipment, and supplies around the battlespace without depending on host-nation facilities.
The second project, at €30 million ($33 million), addresses the less glamorous but equally critical problem of where to put troops. Two new accommodation buildings will be constructed at Lielvārde, each designed to house 152 soldiers under standard conditions with the capacity to expand to 304 if the operational situation requires it. A third residential building in Riga is also under construction as part of the same investment tranche. Together these projects give the Canadian-led NATO Multinational Brigade in Latvia a significantly larger permanent housing capacity, reducing the reliance on temporary facilities that constrain how long and how effectively a deployed force can sustain operations.
 
Romanian cooks, apparently...

 
Romanian cooks, apparently...

Not surprising considering the ramen and cold hot dogs they tried to pass off as spaghetti years ago.
 
We are 'go' for tactical credibility...

Canada-led brigade in Latvia moves beyond tripwire role, commander says​

RIGA, Latvia — The Canada-led NATO brigade in Latvia has moved beyond its original “tripwire” deterrence posture and is now focused on mounting a credible defense of the Baltic country bordering Russia, according to its commander, Col. Kris Reeves.

Reeves said the shift towards what he described as “tactical credibility” has meant establishing forward locations and stationing troops near Latvia’s eastern border, in the terrain where they would actually fight in the event of a conflict, the Canadian commander told Defense News.

 

Attachments

The rumour on the street is that TFL positions will get rolled into MND-N and Comd TFL will double hat as the SNR (senior national representative) as a BGen not a Col. This would be a welcome change because TFL as constructed is essentially a giant roadblock to MNB-LVA believing it still controlled the entity as a carryover from eFP-BG.
 
If I'm reading this right (and, as always, I stand to be corrected), Canada's going to take part in the current next-level-up HQ by "joining Denmark and Latvia as the third Framework Nation for Multinational Division North" (info-machine statement also attached).

Since the formation seems to have been operational since 2023, including Canada as a nation "represented," does this mean a few more Canadian boss/staff types at the Div HQ?
Generally when one is a framework nation that means you are one of the leaders, taking a share of the positions with other framework members. As such, that would mean a lot more positions in the Div - I would tend to think not just a few staff folks at Div HQ - but Div enablers as well.

So Canada will have a continuous operational deployed Divisional HQ segment, and probably move stuff like the guns etc into the Div format as opposed to a Bde
 
Generally when one is a framework nation that means you are one of the leaders, taking a share of the positions with other framework members. As such, that would mean a lot more positions in the Div - I would tend to think not just a few staff folks at Div HQ - but Div enablers as well.

So Canada will have a continuous operational deployed Divisional HQ segment, and probably move stuff like the guns etc into the Div format as opposed to a Bde
Canada likes the glory of filling leadership positions, but a framework nation needs to be more than leadership ... framework includes support. If there are three countries sharing the role of framework nation, those three countries should be furnishing the majority of the division level support (and corps/theatre level support in the absence of a higher level command providing that).
 
Canada likes the glory of filling leadership positions, but a framework nation needs to be more than leadership ... framework includes support. If there are three countries sharing the role of framework nation, those three countries should be furnishing the majority of the division level support (and corps/theatre level support in the absence of a higher level command providing that).
I would wonder also if there is an expectation that the CA is going to step up to have a pure CA Bde, and Div HQ and Support requirements.
Then what the CANCON Corps/Theatre Support requirements would be, or if those could be rolled up into a more robust Divisional set?
 
Generally when one is a framework nation that means you are one of the leaders, taking a share of the positions with other framework members. As such, that would mean a lot more positions in the Div - I would tend to think not just a few staff folks at Div HQ - but Div enablers as well.

So Canada will have a continuous operational deployed Divisional HQ segment, and probably move stuff like the guns etc into the Div format as opposed to a Bde
All of that plus the leadership of the division is rotational so every third rotation Canada should assume leadership. We've already had a deputy div commander role.

I'm not 100% certain as to the structure there. Estonia and Lithuania each have their own divisions reporting to MNC-NE. (Estonia used to be part of MND-N but I think that has changed) The last time I looked, the formations assigned to MND-N included the MNB-Latvia; the Latvian Mech Inf Bde; 2 and 3 Latvian National Guard Brigades; the 1st Danish Brigade located in Denmark; and a multinational support battalion.

I don't know much more than that and wouldn't discuss it on this open forum if I did, but just on the open source artillery basis, I think the structure is based on brigade group close support regiments/battalions. I think that a divisional arty bde is a step off in the very distant future. The Latvians have an M109 battalion, the Danes have an Israeli ATMOS battalion and a battery of Israeli PULS MLRS, (having given Ukraine its battalion of Caesars) and the MNB-Latvia has a multinational arty battalion which currently has a Canadian battery of M777s and a Spanish battery of M109s. That said, there is an arty cell within MND-N but the whole structure needs work.

🍻
 
Back
Top