• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

CAN-USA 2025 Tariff Strife (split from various pol threads)

I view DJT as an irredeemable conman that I wouldn't trust to give me last nights scores- but In this case I would actually lean to his version being more "true."

It's a lowest common denominator explanation that misrepresents the details of the actual situation via simplification- de facto vice de jure kind of thing. American banks are not technically banned, but from their perspective our regulatory regime creates an untenable competitive environment, which has resulted in them having an insignificant and inexplicably small market share for a supposedly "free trade" environment- which is kind of potato-potahtoe from their side of the fence. I don't think knowledgeable person would argue the principle of the matter, that our regulatory regime does indeed stifle competition and restrict entry. We just don't care because we like it the way it is- it serves the interest of our people.

Someone on our side trying to refute the above and position our banking industry as open and competitive by framing 113 billion in cumulative assets as being in any way meaningful is counting on audience ignorance of the scale of the banking industry to deceptively invalidate the US concerns and avoid discussing the crux of the issue- that certain of our national interests definitely do fly in the face of free trade, and that if the US pushes we may be forced to choose.

We gain nothing by meeting his lies with lies to ourselves, or by burying our heads in the sand about the nature of their grievances.

Kind of like his beef with the Euros - regulations equal non-tariff trade barriers, couched in morality.
 
He doesn’t want Canada, it’s a net loss for Republicans. He wants Canada to act - so insulting sovereignty is one way to get Canadians to actually act on that.

I’m sure he also enjoys watching people lose their minds about nonsense.

He is a very cunning showman.

As I said before, the only threat the Canadians will believe is the US.
 
He doesn’t want Canada, it’s a net loss for Republicans. He wants Canada to act - so insulting sovereignty is one way to get Canadians to actually act on that.

I’m sure he also enjoys watching people lose their minds about nonsense.

He is a very cunning showman.
Besides he’d have to contend with Quebec. And The Maritimes. Newfoundland would totally fuck him up - eh bys?

OK so I will add this here: I was on another platform and people sure like to toss the word "Nazi" around or address people with the German "Herr" as if to say "he's a Nazi".

Well - I pointed out that Harper, nor Poliviere condone concentration camps. Nor did they chant in the street celebrating the murders, rapes and kidnappings of Israelis - they in fact condemned it. I am sick and tired of assholes calling others "Nazis" because they don't like their politics.
 
Last edited:
Not so true as it used to be. First we had to put up with the Irish, then it was Italians and Pakistanis, now its the English. Its getting harder to find a Scot.
Mate, last time I got off a plane in Scotland I thought I must've flown to bloody Africa by mistake...

The Irish & the English aren't the problem anymore (well, that might not as true about the English as it possibly sounds...)

It's the bloody HORDES of folks from what seems like everywhere south of Libya that makes it hard to find Scottish people in Scotland
 
I think we might get some Team Blue clues from these:



My take is that he wants to unlock the resources and get them to tide water to sell to the international market, keeping in mind that we already have one really good customer.

Finally someone is talking sense and in a language Trump understands. Now we just need to get both the red and the orange liberals out of the way, and the sooner the better.
 
I’d suggest the easiest start is actually jailing people for significant drug seizures. Which we don’t do. If we catch and release I don’t think it matters how many dudes are watching.
100% this...

The number of people I've come across at work who have a criminal history/rap sheet a mile long, but have never even stepped foot in a jail, is A LOT more than most ppl would think...

and the inverse is also true.

The amount of inmates I've come across who have been sentenced to 90 days, 6 months, or a year who don't have any sort of lengthy criminal history and who committed fairly non-serious crimes is A LOT more than I ever would have expected when I first got into this profession.


I suspect that until we start remanding and handing down in-custody sentences to the actual bad guys, or bring back mandatory minimum sentences for certain offences, not much can change.

The police do their jobs. It's judges with a warped sense of responsibility to the community and, to be frank, extremely unimpressive crown prosecutors, that nees to start doing theirs.



Until that happens, I suspect it'll be next to impossible to shake the soft on crime image we've cultivated for ourselves.
 
Lots to digest here. My hot take having just read this:

1. 10,000 ‘front line personnel’ for the border: who, doing what? How many will actually be new and how many are new over and above the prior $1.3b announcement and the resources that have already been shifted? Lots of lacking detail.

2. Joint organized crime/money laundering task force. Ok, cool. Who are we going to staff it with? Will there be any increase in available Human Resources over and above the exiting law enforcement/financial intelligence pool? Will there be new regulatory powers?

3. Listing the cartels as terrorist entities: the criteria for listing a terrorist group are specific and require an ideological/political component per the definitions of terrorism in the criminal code. Not sure how they’ll force that particular shaped peg in that particular shaped hole.

4. Basically all of this is coming down to a ton of further demand on federal policing priorities. Listing the cartels puts a huge additional burden on RCMP national security. Any resources shifted to the cartels will probably come at the expense of other major drug investigations including domestic fentanyl production. Is there a plan to somehow significantly bolster RCMP Human Resources? Or FINTRAC, or CBSA?

5. We need more courts and prosecutors. These are complex investigations. Courts are already tossing files.

I don’t know how they’re going to do the things they say they’re going to do. More thoughts once I really digest this.
A bit more from a high level/early days perspective here ....
 
I beg to differ with you on that. Canadians are finally waking up to the threats posed by China.
Are they, though?

With a milquetoast ‘some influences here and there, didn’t affect any elections, some things should be improved but overall Canada’s fine’ Hogue Commission final report, Canadians didn’t seem to be all that worried. There isn’t even much of a call to hear whether the person they’ll potentially be voting for in the next election was compromised by, or collaborating with China.

Maybe when the US starts publicly releasing information from future ‘joint operations’ it conducts with Canada against drug related/supported criminal activities in Canada, Canadians might take enough notice to become vocal and actioned to hold their parliamentarians to account? Or not…
 
OK so I will add this here: I was on another platform and people sure like to toss the word "Nazi" around or address people with the German "Herr" as if to say "he's a Nazi".
I get called traitor a lot, as do other people from what I'm seeing on other platforms. It seems to be the new nazi.
 
What kind of mental gymnastics is one playing to suddenly pretend like being patriotic matters now? Suddenly we need to buy Canadian goods due to incoming Trump tariffs. Buy Canadian, flatten the curve, stay home, boo US anthems, if not you're a nazi. If nothing else, these next 4 years will be entertaining, we are all in this together.
 
Back
Top