- Reaction score
- 10,071
- Points
- 1,160
Firearm ownership and the ability to defend oneself from the old "enemies, foreign and domestic" is important to me. I like to know when someone would use force in the name of duty to disarm citizens. I personally find that quit fascist.It is my duty to follow orders yes. If the order is legal, I follow. So do you. How is that relevant to the discussion about Canadian national integrity?
There's a nexus national integrity and the "patriots" I mentioned who support a government trying to disarm Canadians. I'd go so far to say it's our duty as Canadians to oppose that government.
But duty is an easy word to try and force certain narrow minded views with.
Cool.No, this real and not hypothetical person did not.
I don't condemn or ridicule CAF members who didn't get an opportunity to deploy. It happens and they're by no means second class.Of the crime of being 16 by the end of the last shooting war, I am guilty. Which you seem to be implying lessens my ability to form opinions.
Now if you would please be so kind as to answer the question, but try not to insult all of our fellow forumers that didnt get the opportunity to leave the wire in Afghanistan again, they're allowed to have opinions too. Not quite the own you think you had.
If someone questions me on my willingness to serve (maybe sacrifice for) Canada, which is fine, I just like to know if they've actually witnessed/partaken in what they're challenging me on.
Of course I would defend Canada against the US, which I suspect isn't the own you thought you had , either

Last edited: