Canada moves to 2% GDP end of FY25/26 - PMMC

[CBH99]

I didn't think we hit 2% yet.

After some quick reading, I think you're right.

(I thought I had read recently that the DND budget was increased by $8.1B to meet that 2% goal, and read elsewhere it was closer to an extra $9B...but now that I google it, I think I got my wires crossed somewhere)

 

[dapaterson]

GoC intent as I understand it is for the 25/26 whole of government defence expenditures (cash, not accrual) to be 2% of GDP.

 

[daftandbarmy]

And?

How well is that welfare thing working out for us?

20% success is better than 0%.

...

In the "real world" how many people go through two or three jobs before they find a fit and settle down.

Looks like 50/50...

Stuck in neutral: Canada’s economic worries and federal ballot impasse​

The headlines tell the story: a statistical tie between the major parties, a public increasingly willing to back tough measures on homelessness, and a consumer base growing more pessimistic by the week. As 2025 draws to a close, Canada’s leaders face a restive electorate, wary of both economic and social uncertainty.

Stuck in neutral: Canada’s economic worries and federal ballot impasse

Weekly Upshot of Nanos Reports and News Coverage

niknanos.substack.com

 

[MilEME09]

After some quick reading, I think you're right.

(I thought I had read recently that the DND budget was increased by $8.1B to meet that 2% goal, and read elsewhere it was closer to an extra $9B...but now that I google it, I think I got my wires crossed somewhere)

Bill C6 and C7 added a fair bit to the DND budget, but it will take a lot more then money at the problem to fix things. Talking with some very Senior RCEME types, we could hit 2% just buying spare parts to get our VOR rate as close to 0 as possible.

 

[dapaterson]

Bill C6 and C7 added a fair bit to the DND budget, but it will take a lot more then money at the problem to fix things. Talking with some very Senior RCEME types, we could hit 2% just buying spare parts to get our VOR rate as close to 0 as possible.

Not all needed spares are readily available on the market.

There's a need for a national defence industrial strategy that also looks at reliable partner nations.

 

[MilEME09]

Not all needed spares are readily available on the market.

There's a need for a national defence industrial strategy that also looks at reliable partner nations.

Not just partners, stock piling, we need warehouses of technical stores again

 

[FJAG]

Not all needed spares are readily available on the market.

There's a need for a national defence industrial strategy that also looks at reliable partner nations.

Not just partners, stock piling, we need warehouses of technical stores again

And our own manufacturing base.

 

[Ludoc]

Not just partners, stock piling, we need warehouses of technical stores again

Not just that, tools. If an MRT gets blown up but the crew survives how do they replace whats in their tool boxes? I'm not just talking about wrenches but specialty diagnostic equipment. For better or worse, everything we buy has computers and electronics sensors embedded. The types of equipment we need to service that stuff isn't something we can just buy at Canadian Tire. If Veh Techs/FCS Techs/Sig Techs/etc need replacements they come from industry, not a stock pile. If we need a lot of tools, fast, to grow the Army in an emergency we will have the same problem we did buying masks during COVID. Other nations, with deeper pockets, will be out bidding us.