
GMARS (like SK's K239 Chunmoo) has two launch pods compared to the single pod on HIMARS but only HIMARS fits in a C-130J. Does double the fire power trump reduced strategic mobility?
I mean, it is a priority again and this time with momentum.Apprpriate that this 2025 solution is appended to a thread about a 2009 priority.
I mean, it is a priority again and this time with momentum.
The Pacific Theatre is just different, as the Australians are discovering with their own HIMARS. While 500km is impressive in the NATO context (it lets you shoot from Riga into Minsk or Pskov) —distances in the Pacific are measured in thousands, not hundreds of kilometres. Hence why things like the Long Range Hypersonic Weapon/Dark Eagle are so important. The US is also bringing back ground launched Tomahawk, made famous in the Cold War.Having said that, I do wonder at what "long" means, and how the Canadian Army sees using that range.
There is a whole lot more than a handful of ground-launched Tomahawk launchers required for the CA to be serious about the operations in the Pacific.The Pacific Theatre is just different, as the Australians are discovering with their own HIMARS. While 500km is impressive in the NATO context (it lets you shoot from Riga into Minsk or Pskov) —distances in the Pacific are measured in thousands, not hundreds of kilometres. Hence why things like the Long Range Hypersonic Weapon/Dark Eagle are so important. The US is also bringing back ground launched Tomahawk, made famous in the Cold War.
With Canada getting into the Tomahawk game anyway with the River-class, ground launched Tomahawk might be a natural fit for Canada — if we’re serious about the Pacific.
The Pacific Theatre is just different, as the Australians are discovering with their own HIMARS. While 500km is impressive in the NATO context (it lets you shoot from Riga into Minsk or Pskov) —distances in the Pacific are measured in thousands, not hundreds of kilometres. Hence why things like the Long Range Hypersonic Weapon/Dark Eagle are so important. The US is also bringing back ground launched Tomahawk, made famous in the Cold War.
With Canada getting into the Tomahawk game anyway with the River-class, ground launched Tomahawk might be a natural fit for Canada — if we’re serious about the Pacific.
Someone’s starting to eat someone’s lunch….Norway has decided to go with Hanwha's Chunmoo
You don't buy weapons with a significant cyber component from someone who has recently threatened you. There may not be a bespoke "kill switch" but the country with proprietary access to the hardware and software is the country who knows the known vulnerabilities.Someone’s starting to eat someone’s lunch….
I hear you.You don't buy weapons with a significant cyber component from someone who has recently threatened you. There may not be a bespoke "kill switch" but the country with proprietary access to the hardware and software is the country who knows the known vulnerabilities.
Norway has decided to go with Hanwha's Chunmoo
notesfrompoland.com


defence-industry.eu
In two words - persistent overlap. It provides one more A2/AD system that will be there when neither aircraft nor ships are available or within range.I heard some discussion about why the Army would spend money on long range fires that could be supplied by the air force or the navy. For starters they don't need to burn gas just to stand in place. They can park up and mind their own business until there is some trade in the area.
That's a technique and it might work in some situations but I certainly wouldn't use it routinely. It's the HIMARS equivalent of the old artillery "sniping gun" procedure. That's when you sent a gun forward to the infantry in order to take out, with direct fire, a stubborn pill box or other fortified position hard to hit with indirect fire. We used to practice that every few years to keep our hand in it and because its a fun shoot.As to being able to fly them in .... the fly them in, roll out, fire, retire, fly out scenario doesn't make any sense to me. For that type of situation you might as well send a fighter/LRASM combo to deal with a one-off shot.
Yup.On the other hand, being able to rapidly relocate to face evolving threats makes all the sense in the world.
Now if only somebody would invent a 1000 km ASROC.
Now if only somebody would invent a 1000 km ASROC.