• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

Canada's tanks

Isn't Ajax like the M2 Bradley a recce vehicle with minimal dismounts?
Ajax very definitely is. The Ares version, however, has no turret, just an RWS and more interior space and is classified as the series APC version. It's tough finding info on its pax capacity although I have found its complement to be a crew of two and room for up to seven dismounts.

I haven't seen anything specific on how the Brits are doing the new version of cavalry and have been looking at it as an analogue to how they used Scimitar, Spartan and Stryker. I see Ajax as the Scimitar recce/surveillance replacement and Ares as the Spartan infantry carrier replacement. Since there is no specific Stryker ATGM replacement, I think they are using Ares with dismountable ATGMs. A recce sqn used to have three recce troops, one ATGM troop and one support (infantry) troop.

🍻
 
Ajax very definitely is. The Ares version, however, has no turret, just an RWS and more interior space and is classified as the series APC version. It's tough finding info on its pax capacity although I have found its complement to be a crew of two and room for up to seven dismounts.

I haven't seen anything specific on how the Brits are doing the new version of cavalry and have been looking at it as an analogue to how they used Scimitar, Spartan and Stryker. I see Ajax as the Scimitar recce/surveillance replacement and Ares as the Spartan infantry carrier replacement. Since there is no specific Stryker ATGM replacement, I think they are using Ares with dismountable ATGMs. A recce sqn used to have three recce troops, one ATGM troop and one support (infantry) troop.

🍻


It looks as if the Striker/Swingfire overwatch role is, as you say to be done with an Ares variant armed with Brimstones.

I doubt if that will be doing any dismount work. Perhaps the dismounts in the Assault Troop Ares will be equipped with Javelin.
 
Just did a little surfing and came across a forum discussing AJAX. That included a 2022 post as to how the Royal Dragoon Guards were reorganizing:

FSCbViKUYAA-eBw


So basically, it will move from 4 recce squadrons and HQ squadrons, to 4 squadron structure
  • HQ Squadron
  • The Green Horse Squadron - recce squadron
  • The Black Horse Squadron - anti-tank squadron
  • The Blue Horse Squadron - fire support squadron

I doubt if this was, or is, the last word.

🍻
 
You pays yer money and you takes yer chances.


It is comforting to know everybody is having the same debate and nobody knows the answer.

I stand by staying light on our feet and figuring out how to react and adapt in a hurry.
 
Ukraine has tapped the Lynx going forward as it's future IFV, and with local production there will be lots of hulls to mount Skyranger's which I assume plays a part in this decision.

I've been resistant to the modularity, offered by Boxer, as more of a fad than a practical solution. With Lynx also being modular, I've now come to the conclusion that a tracked chassis and a wheeled chassis (regardless of chassis manufacturer) which accept common modules, would be an extremely significant advantage to the manufacturing, fielding and training cycle.

I'm a firm believer in tracked IFVs in armoured forces, but am not against wheeled armoured vehicles. Each has its place and many of the mission modules ought to be identical.

Betcha we don't have RFP asking for that.

🍻
 
Back
Top