That is so true. I started in Grade 9 in what Ontario at the time was called the Science, technology and Trades program which prepared you for the only establishment afterwards which would take you further - Ryerson Technical College. There were 20 Grade 9 classes at RH King CI that year. I took six shop classes (including auto, wood, welding, sheet metal, machine and I can't remember what the last one was called but we did stuff with plastics). There were two other course streams - Business and Commerce which basically trained what was then a 100% student body of girls to be secretaries and Arts and Sciences which was the university-destined stream.
In Grade 10 I switched to A&S because there was a new high school opening about a block from where I lived. They had no ST&T, just B&C and A&S. I took the one shop class they offered each year for the rest of high school (and worked on the stage crew. The drop-out rate was very heavy. By the time I reached 13 there were only four classes out of twenty left. The rest had gone to work (or jail).
After working some time as an electrician apprentice, I opted for officer training and, in those days all one needed was junior matric which in the 13 grade Ontario system meant grade 12 while most everywhere else in Canada it was grade 11. In those days it was actually possible to be a high school dropout and earn a living.
There was a reason for this in southern Ontario. Post war there had been a massive program of hydro development in Ontario. There was lots of cheap electricity available and the manufacturing industry expanded by leaps and bounds in the 50s and 60s. If there is one thing that I do believe governments have failed to foster programs of energy development and otherwise also creating a climate in which business, that need labour, can thrive. Similarly, we do fund too many post secondary education programs that are essentially basket-weaving 101 (actually basket weaving might be more productive than the "politics and propaganda in the cinema" that I took one year.)
Getting back to the 2% issue and how do we spend the money to fill the ranks of both the RegF and the ARes. IMHO, dropping the education entry level would be a positive one. I've argued many times in this forum for subsidizing community college training to fill many of our trades with people who would then simultaneously earn a civilian ticket in conjunction with a military skill in exchange for a period of obligatory service. Same for the officer ranks. Take them while they are young, train them as low level leaders and provide advanced education commensurate with their fields such as aeronautic engineering a bit further down in their career for those who have proven themselves and who are destined for higher and better things. And then there is starting a proper warrant officer program to take high school kids and make them technical experts in certain specialist fields in exchange for higher entry level pay equivalent to that of officers. And for heaven's sake - never, ever have people wait for a year to get in or between DP1 courses. Tailor our recruiting and education system to mesh fully with the civilian education system (and yes - that means using the summertime as prime military training time.)