- Reaction score
- 17,743
- Points
- 1,010
Either way, a degree in basket weaving or liberal arts sure doesn't sound to me like something very 'useful' to be a officer or a pilot.
And you would be wrong- but thanks for coming out!
Either way, a degree in basket weaving or liberal arts sure doesn't sound to me like something very 'useful' to be a officer or a pilot.
arctic_front said:I'm speaking strictly rotary-wing here, not the jet-jockey's who may require a higher education in physics or calculus to fly a fast mover.
Like any field, on the job training is where you really start to learn, the school part is just so much theory and book learning. My point is, a good set of hands on the stick is better than a head full of university mush.
Just my humble opinion as a civy helicopter AME.
arctic_front said:Just my humble opinion as a civy helicopter AME.
arctic_front said:... doesn't sound to me like something very 'useful' to be a officer or a pilot.
I can't speak for the piloting side, but the demonstrated ability to think critically does have a significant value for being an officer. It is true that having a degree is not proof of intelligence, and the absence of a degree is not even suggestive of an intellectual deficiency. However, in general, a degree indicates some formal effort has been made toward the betterment of an individual's critical thinking capability. This first step is of great value, and it is built-upon thought an officer's career.arctic_front said:Sea king Taco.... please enlighten me as to how a liberal arts, or any other degree, is necessary to flying?
arctic_front said:FYI, I have also flown them too... as they often have the co-pilot sticks in the other side.
because i know how they work, just as well as any pilot does, in a lot of cases, better than they do. Your welcome.
so where does the university degree come into this? Or, the math?
Just because they are painted green doesn't change the aerodynamic principles involved in making a heavier than air machine lift off the ground.
I am just a little surprised that you assume that an AME is too stupid to understand complex subjects such as ring-state vortices, retreating blade stall, or settling with power.
I also know plenty about navigation, weight & balance, avionics and instrumentation.
so why do you think it's ok to bash me because I am a lowly 'grease-monkey?'
I work as an aviator, same as you.
Colin P said:Yet the US army seems quite happy have NCO's fly their gunships,
Colin P said:Considering the skill shortages facing the military, one would think they would bend over backwards to get trained pilots.
MCG said:Are you sure the US has NCO pilots? A US Warrant Officer is not an NCO.
SeaKingTacco said:And you would be wrong- but thanks for coming out!
arctic_front said:Either way, a degree in basket weaving or liberal arts sure doesn't sound to me like something very 'useful' to be a officer or a pilot.
arctic_front said:A 1000 hr. civilian pilot would make a better prospect for a WO grade helo-pilot than some recent college/university green horn that has to learn from the bottom.
The piece of paper with the B.A. doesn't make him pilot material, the Aircrew Selection process makes him pilot material.arctic_front said:A piece of paper with B.A. after his name, doesn't make him pilot material.
It's spending thousands of dollar to form an officer.arctic_front said:Spending thousands of dollars to 'see' if he can be a pilot sounds like a waste of resources.
I don't think you can really speak for any pilot here (unless you have a license or are in the process of getting one). Riding shotgun doesn't mean you understand everything the pilot does.arctic_front said:I'm speaking strictly rotary-wing here, not the jet-jockey's who may require a higher education in physics or calculus to fly a fast mover.
Again, it's not the theories you learned that you use but the problem solving skills you got in University. In that respect, I do believe that a University degree is usefull for any Officer trade, pilot included.arctic_front said:Like any field, on the job training is where you really start to learn, the school part is just so much theory and book learning. My point is, a good set of hands on the stick is better than a head full of university mush.