- Reaction score
- 6,951
- Points
- 1,260
28 K9's and 14 K10's and that enough to warrant a production/assembly facility??28K9/14K10

28 K9's and 14 K10's and that enough to warrant a production/assembly facility??28K9/14K10
i think they were going to transition to building the Redback after?28 K9's and 14 K10's and that enough to warrant a production/assembly facility??
They didn't fire on Nanook1 RCHA sends a round down range up North.
![]()
I think that it goes well above mere assembly but probably short of the manufacture of all components in Australia. There are a number of Australian and individual partner companies involved and it appears Australian production will figure into the global supply chain for the K9.
![]()
28 K9's and 14 K10's and that enough to warrant a production/assembly facility??
There's a lot of truth in that but I say squeeze them for everything they're worth. We need more capacity and competition here.How about, it is enough to build a well equipped maintenance and repair shop that can assemble tanks from components and train maintainers concurrently?
I believe so.i think they were going to transition to building the Redback after?
28 K9's and 14 K10's and that enough to warrant a production/assembly facility??

thedefensepost.com
thedefensepost.com


Not sure I’d want to put all (or anymore) eggs into the 8x8 basket.One 8x8 truck for launching all missile types, both surface-surface and surface-air, as well as LAMs and UAVs, that could also port a Skyranger 30 or 35 or a 155mm AGM.
The RCA is re-equipped.
Each vehicle seems to be in the 5 to 10 MUSD apiece range.