• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

Indirect Fires Modernization Project - C3/M777 Replacement

1 RCHA sends a round down range up North.

646527944_1331943775641970_2058642036335996431_n.jpg


I think that it goes well above mere assembly but probably short of the manufacture of all components in Australia. There are a number of Australian and individual partner companies involved and it appears Australian production will figure into the global supply chain for the K9.

🍻
They didn't fire on Nanook
 
i think they were going to transition to building the Redback after?
I believe so.

28 K9's and 14 K10's and that enough to warrant a production/assembly facility??

The original intent was also for 450 Redbacks, rather than the 129 they've ordered, and a second batch of K9/K10s which was similarly cancelled. They went instead for more HIMARS, littoral craft, free up money for nuclear subs, etc. Maybe they'll make small additional orders as the production run nears its end to keep it going, or perhaps it'll become their repair/overhaul facility for them?
 
Germany operating on the same scale as Poland. 500 local HIMARS knockoffs.



1772657110408.jpeg


....


And bunches of Air Defence missile launchers as well. - 50 Systems (Batteries)


And Skyranger SHORAD as well - 600


....

If we want factories then we need to start upping the orders by a zero.
 
One 8x8 truck for launching all missile types, both surface-surface and surface-air, as well as LAMs and UAVs, that could also port a Skyranger 30 or 35 or a 155mm AGM.

The RCA is re-equipped.

Each vehicle seems to be in the 5 to 10 MUSD apiece range.
 
One 8x8 truck for launching all missile types, both surface-surface and surface-air, as well as LAMs and UAVs, that could also port a Skyranger 30 or 35 or a 155mm AGM.

The RCA is re-equipped.

Each vehicle seems to be in the 5 to 10 MUSD apiece range.
Not sure I’d want to put all (or anymore) eggs into the 8x8 basket.
 
200 + Boxer RCH155


View attachment 98775

But this is also possible.

View attachment 98774
I don't really see how much more value the boxer version gives you over the truck version? I suspect the trucks ease of maintenance, road mobility, extra payload will outweigh any of the benefits of the additional armour. These will rarely if ever come under direct fire and will be targets by artillery and FPV drones, in which case the extra armour might not help.
 
I don't really see how much more value the boxer version gives you over the truck version? I suspect the trucks ease of maintenance, road mobility, extra payload will outweigh any of the benefits of the additional armour. These will rarely if ever come under direct fire and will be targets by artillery and FPV drones, in which case the extra armour might not help.

If you want armour there is nothing to stop armouring the cab.
 
Back
Top